10-11-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator September 14, 1993 A ' SUBJECT: #1850 James Spinner, 940 North Arm Drive - Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits A - Location Map B - Original Survey C - Current Survey D - Hardcover Fact Sheets 0-75’, 75-250’ and 250-500’ E - Plan for Hardcover Removal F - Average Lakeshore Setback Sketch At your August meeting. Application #1850 was tabled so that an updated survey and hardcover inventory could be provided. In return, applicant was to review the ne#. tarts and to present plan for hardcover reductions. Review Exhibits C and D, the 929.4 designation of the shoreline has impacted the original hardcover facts presented for consideration in the original review. There is both structural and noastnicniral hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area at 24.92%. The majority of the proposed garage stall will be located within the 0-75* setback and will encroach the setback line by 10’ (65’ from shoreline). The closest deck structure to the lakeshore extends 18’ into the lakeshore protected area (57 ’ setback). The proposed structure will result in 209 s.f. of new structural hardcover within tlie 0-75’ and 55 s.f. of structural hardcover in the 75-250 setback area. Please refer to Exhibits D-2, D-3 and E, as noted in the earlier review from site inspections, it appeared that there was no plastic underlying the landscape areas as shown in Section 3 and 7. .Siaffdid not inspect the north side of the residence to determine if there was a plastic underlincr (Sections 1 and 10 of hardcover inventory). The applicant has lived there over fourteen years and states he has not installed plastic underliner bf'nealh landscape areas. If it was installed, it was installed over fourteen years ago and has probably deteriorated. Thus the reason for sporadic growth also observed by surveyor. Mr. Spinner would agree to removal all areas underlined with plastic and will remove 96 s.f. of planter box and concrete walkway to west side of residence (refer to Exhibit E). When Mr. Spinner was asked to consider the removal of the cofw:rete pad on the north side of the structure (8 and 11 per inventory key) and the section to the north and east side of the proposed garage stall within the 0-75’ setback area (a portion of 9). he suted that he could not as the concrete area along the north side was sloped to keep drainage away from foundation.