10-11-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File ^1857 October 7, 1993 Review of Amended Application r f'''’The applicant has submitted an amended application for Council’s consideration. In the amended application, the addition would now extend no further than the existing 10’ deck. The following variances are required for tne amended proposal: Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage. Total lot area = 12,800 s.f. Allowed = 1,920 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,254 s.f. or 17.6% Proposed = 2,254 s.f. or 17.6% No change in structural coverage Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Average lakeshore setback, review Exhibit J. Allowed = 0 Proposed = 10’ Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover within 75-250’ setback area. Area = 7,680 s.f. Allowed = 1,920 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,907 s.f. or 50.8% Proposed = 3,907 s.f. or 50.8% Variance = 1,987 s f. or 25.8% Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) - Side yard setback. Required = 10’ Existing = 7’5" Proposed = 7’5" Variance = 2’5" or 25% Please review Exhibits L and M, tetters from neighboring property owners who claim no problem with applicant ’s proposal. In tact, neighbor to north alwges that norther.* comer of his residence would be approximately in line with applicant s addition based on the arch or curve of the shoreline. The deck on the south side will extend no closer than the existing deck. There will still be the possibility that a structural addition could be installed on the residence to the north or south without the need for an average lakeshore setback variance because of the realignment in the average lakeshore setback line.