My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986 Planning Packets
>
11-17-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 10:06:35 AM
Creation date
1/18/2024 10:00:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ring <br />)oth <br />;s <br />uld <br />ion <br />Zoning File #1090 <br />November 11, 1986 <br />Page 2 <br />II. Issues Unresolved Prom Previous Subdivision Approvals <br />A. Garage on proposed Lot 2: <br />from the P>^oP°sed Lot 2 was to be removed <br />aoD^val in^Q7r ? condition of original subdivisionapproval in 1978. Pol low-up inspections conducted in 1979, 1980 and 1986 <br />indicate this has never been done. <br />B. Access driveway to County Road 6: <br />An access driveway serving the residences on proposed Lot 1 was to be <br />removed and regraded to eliminate any direct acceL o?f of CountTload 6. <br />Road** but^^hlf ni'a* athose residences from Hollander Road, but the old driveway was never removed and today is still used as a <br />primary access from County Road 6. <br />C. Road outlet ownership: <br />years persisted in trying to have the Citv <br />take over Hollander Road as a public road. The City never intended it to <br />wri’l"nit^thaf the road as public. YoS <br />with Hlldur*^p’^ listed Orono as "taxpayer" on the road outlot1th Hildur P. Hollander as owner (see property owners list). The Citv has <br />been doing battle with Hennepin County over this for at least 3-4 years. <br />AssociatiorT^n^mafnf never filed the paperwork to create a Homeowner's <br />HolTan^i^ existing homeowners served by <br />AsiociatiL unanimous agreement regarding a Homeowner's <br />going probTem^ maintenance and ownership of the road is a potential on- <br />III. Issues and Facts Regarding Proposed Lots: <br />A. Lot 1 <br />Lhibit*E‘^ well on Lot 1 are approximately as shown onExhibit E. Soil testing to find an alternate site for the large house <br />but no report as of this writing. Note that driveway <br />might be over the existing drainfield, but it is functionino <br />adequately. The small rental house has a septic system, but no well to staff's knowledge. wexi <br />'^equl'^ed 30- side setbacks and other required setbacks from proposed property lines. <br />he ^ requires a variance to lot width as measured at <br />the 50 setback from County Road 6 (186.90' where 200' is required) <br />lot width requirement as measured based on the private road being the front yard. private <br />■Jl
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.