My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
11-17-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 10:06:35 AM
Creation date
1/18/2024 10:00:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Orono Planning Commission Members <br />i August <br />:ional; <br />iverage <br />”, 27”, <br />iverage <br />14”, 40" <br />:ent to <br />iverage <br />40", <br />pes and <br />iverage <br />8”, 48" <br />:;urtain <br />■ T <br />iverage <br />, 29" - <br />saddle" <br />otes as <br />e slope <br />ble for <br />site is <br />iverage <br />', 42" - <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />November 13, 1986 <br />Subject: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment - Guest Apartments <br />Pertinent Code Sections: <br />10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) <br />10.08, Subdivision 3 (A)(7) <br />10.02, Def. #28 <br />Def. #22 <br />The intent of the proposed amendment is to establish performance <br />standards for non-rental guest apartments within principal residences. In <br />the past, the City used the "Guest House" Section 10.20, Subdivison 3 (G) <br />in dealing with such apartments, although the wording of Subdivision 3 (G) <br />clearly was^ written to pertain to separate detached structures, especially <br />the regulation for meeting "all regular lot requirements". <br />In the recent past, staff has suggested that such guest apartments, <br />may more appropriately fall under Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A)(7) as a <br />variance. The full intent of the legislature, in the recent amendment of <br />the State Statutes, is not known, ". .the governing body as the case may <br />be, may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one family dwelling as <br />a two family dwelling." Note use of may instead of shall weakens the <br />directive but clearly a Municipality cannot be accused of granting a "use <br />variance". The state is responding to the economic pressures facing many <br />homesteads and the need to encourage local governments to define legal, <br />innovative ways to solve the dilema. Staff feels it would be appropriate <br />under specific conditions to allow guest apartments as an accessory use, <br />with performance standards written into the code, as follows: <br />Add Section 10.20, Subdivis.ic^:;^ 4 (I): <br />I. Non-rental Guest Apartments. An apartment within the principal <br />residence structure for the sole use of the occupants of the principal <br />residence, including their domestic employees or non-paying guests. <br />There shall be at least one access door to the apartment from within <br />the principal structure, and such door shall be the primary access to <br />the apartment. <br />Define Guest Apartment Itf adding Section 10.02, Subdivision 28 (a) as <br />follows: <br />"Guest Apartment" - An apartmenu within a principal residence <br />structure for the sole use of the occupants of the principal <br />residence, including their domestic employees or their non-paying <br />9uests. There shall be at least one access door to the apartment from <br />within the principal structure, and such door shall be the primary <br />access to the apartment. <br />As an alternative, because allowing guest apartments as an accessory <br />use gives up certain controls such as filing a resolution in the chain of <br />title, the same performance standard could be incorporated into the <br />conditional use section. This would maintain a somewhat greater degree of <br />but would still require an application before the Planning <br />Commission and Council, which is in some cases an unwieldy process. <br />Are there any conditions under which the "accessory use" status could <br />be granted without the i.eed for filing a resolution?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.