Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1079 <br />September 11,1986 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />e) Determination on shared use of Outlet A - riparian <br />lot - special lot combination and variance required. <br />Current LMCD standard requires 50' per boat slip - <br />should each lot be allowed shared dock use as in Fox <br />Hill plat? <br />f) The lot owned by Anderson that appears as an <br />exception should be included in the rezoning ~ owner <br />should sign formal application. The subject property <br />also includes the Harris and Gardener property. Both <br />owners should sign formal application. <br />Location, Arrangement ^d Size of Lots <br />Applicant should be advised that all existing <br />structures/improvements should be located on preliminary plat. <br />2 acres of dry land must be contiguous within the boundaries of <br />each lot. Building envelopes must provide 200' widths. Usual <br />variance must be granted to all lots served by private road. <br />Parkland Dedication <br />The City already has a park in this neighborhood and will require <br />park fees in lieu of land. <br />Future Development of Undeveloped Lands <br />Lands to the east have been developed - review Exhibit B, City <br />did not plat access to western lot lines of Riedel Co. Stubbs Bay <br />Addition plat. Lands to west are bordered by major expanses of <br />designated wetlands. Property is bordered by Luce Line on north. <br />Staff seeks Planning Commission input on need for future access. <br />Rezoning Issue - <br />Review the intent/purpose of the RR-IA zoning district Section <br />10.27, RR—lB Section 10.28, and LR-lA Section 10.23. Review the <br />following sections in your Comp Plan: <br />Rural Area Goals and Policies CMP 2-6, 2-7 <br />Environmental Protections Goals CMP 3-18 <br />General Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-19 <br />through 3-22 <br />Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-23 <br />Rural Land Use Policies CMP 4-19 through 4-22 <br />Rural Residential Land Use CMP 4-27 through 4-31 <br />Issues for Consideration on Question of Rezoning - <br />1. The majority of the subject property is located within <br />1000 feet of Lake Minnetonka - are the current standards of <br />the RR-IA district suitable? <br />2. Is the current pattern of use more consistent with RR-IA <br />district? - LR-IA? RR-IB? <br />3. Is this spot zoning?