Laserfiche WebLink
To: <br />Pr( <br />Date: <br />Mayor Butler <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator <br />Orono Council Members <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />May 15, 1986 <br />Subject: #1026 Mike Hilbelink/John Vogt, 160 Old Crystal Bay Road <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - RR-IB <br />Total Area - 18.75 Dry Acres <br />Application <br />Lot 1 = <br />Lot 2 = <br />Lot 3 = <br />-Class III Subdivision - Plat - 3 Lots <br />Approximately 3.6 Acres <br />Approximately 7+ Acres <br />Approximately 7+ Acres <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Exhibit F - <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Aerial View <br />Proposed Subdivision <br />Staff Sketch <br />Revi'iw of Application <br />« <br />The applicants propose a 3-lot division of the Peterman property. <br />There are no designated wetlands located within the property. On-site <br />septic testing has been required for only the 3-acred developed lot - <br />lots over 5 acres in area are not tested if preliminary review of <br />soils maps reveals no problem soil. The site evaluation confirms <br />adequate and suitable area for future septic expansion on Lot 1. <br />Access is the major staff concern for this review. The existing <br />access serving Lot 1 is adequate. A future access to Lot 3 along <br />Watertown Road should be located either to the extreme east or west of <br />the lot. The proposed 50 feet wide corridor platted for access to Lot <br />2 is not acceptable. The access is located within 100 feet of the <br />crest of the hill. Old Crystal Bay Road has a 40 mile per hour speed <br />limit. The sight or distance standard for all curb cuts is 275 feet. <br />Staff suggests that the access corridor be relocated to the south - <br />probably along the existing driveway serving Lot 1. (See Exhibit F) <br />as a easement the accessory structure on Lot 1 cannot meet the re­ <br />quired 10 feet setback from the new lot line. A side setback variance <br />would have to be granted but at this point absent a survey, I cannot <br />confirm the exact setback. <br />All other existing structures meet the required setbacks from all <br />proposed lot lines - confirmed by aerials - review Exhibit D.