09-27-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning l ile ^1856 September 7, 1993 Page 3 E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - Existing Survey Survey for Application ^1822 Survey for Proposed Application ^1856 Hardcover Fact Sheet Existing Hardcover F*act Sheet Application ^1822 Hardcover Fact Sheet Proposed Application ^1856 Elevations Existing Basement/First Floor Plans New Basement/F'irst Floor Plans New Second Floor Plan Detailed Structural Site Plan Anderson Letter 8/11/93 Resolution No. 1387 Description of Request The applicant’s current proposal requests a 10' x 26 ’ first floor addition and a complete 26 ’ X 34’ second floor addition. To the immediate rear of the 10 ’ x 26 ’ first floor expansion, a 5’ X 20' open deck with an enclosed 5’ x 6’ entry addition is proposed. The replacement deek/siair structure is at the lakeside of residence where the original application approved in June propo.sed a 13FZ x 18’ replacement deck and stair structure. Refer to Exhibit G. The average lakeshore setback will now be encroached by only 8’ by the replacement deck . The structure at the W'cst .'idc will encroach no closer than existing 6 and will end at 8 . The east side yard setback remains as original application at 7’. Hardcover originally approved at 29.4% is now proposed at 29.5%. The issue for the current review is the need for a height variance as structure consists of three stories tltaf dix*s not exceed a 30 height. Please review' Exhibit P. Mr. Anderson s letter reports no problem with the proposed new addition that will be located 7’ from his side lot line. The City has received no comments from the property owner at the west side where the soutlovcsf corner of addition will be kx'iticd 8 from side lot line. Hardship Sfafemeiil Review Exhibits D and Q Issues for Consideration The three-story structure will be kxated as close as 3’ at the west side lot line and T to the east lot liri At your site inspection, review the structures on either side. Will the 29’ 6' structure have an impact on the adjacent properties? Owner to the cast clainw no impact. IIi