09-27-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1863 September 7, 1993 Page 2 D - F - I* - G - H - Original Survey by Arleigli C. Smith Updated Survey by Coffin & Gronberg Resolution No. 3313 Approving Application #1775 Original Plan Plan Approved by Council at December 1992 Meeting Description of Request Applicant does not wish to adjust structure to the originally approved 3* setback and has filed an amended variance application. The facts for the area of the oversized structure have also been amended as noted above. Tlie structure will now be placed 2’ 4" from the side lot line. As structure will be located 3’ or less from the lot line, special fire wall construction will be required as with the original application. Applicant has received a building permit for the greenhouse addition at the southeast comer of the existing shed and that addition will now be 7.6’ X 5.8 ’ rather than 6’ x 8’ which was originally approved. For more detail on the variances approved with the original application review pages 1 and 2 of approval resolution. Exhibit F. Staff has not adjusted the hardcover facts per the original approval resolution, as entry addition at north side of residence is shown at 4 ’ x 5 ’ and not 4 ’ x 12’ as originally approved. This reduction in proposed hardcover will offset addition of 15.3 s.f. of oversized acce.ssory strucnire. Hardship Statement Please review Exhibit A-1 and the approval resolution. Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Will the additional 8" encroachment have any further impact on property owner to north side? Should we receive an updated response from property owner concerning amended proposal? 2. F.xclusive of architectural or aesthetic consideration, would the 8'" extension to south have an impact on otlier iinpri)vements excluding impact on trees as noted by applicant? 3. Other issues raised by Planning Commission. Any recommendation of approval must include notice to the owner, as in the original approval, that fire wall construction will be required along the north side of the addition as structure will be kKated 3’ or less from lot line. The original approval resolution did not provide a deadline for the removal of existing hardcover. Staff would recommend that the updated approval include the condition that hardcover removals be completed prior to the fitting inspection for the new construction of the accessory structure addition and lakeside addition. It should also be noted that the pitch of detached structure’s roof shall not exceed a 4'/i - 12 pitch.