My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
09-27-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2024 11:09:54 AM
Creation date
1/16/2024 11:06:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabuslh, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />September 7, 1993 <br />#1863 Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle - Amended Variance Application <br />Public Hearing <br />In Dec«:mber of 1992, the applicant received approval of multiple variances for a 15’ x <br />16 'h.' two-story lakeside addition, a 28’ x 22’ garage addition to the existing detached accessory <br />structure and a 6’ x 8’ greenhouse addition at the southeast comer. Variances involved setbacks <br />to the average lakeshore setback line, lot coverage, hardcover excesses in the 75-250 setback <br />area and side and street setback variances for garage addition. The applicant was to remove <br />an approximate 8 '/i’ x 24 ’ grade level deck to the north side of the principal smicmre and to <br />replace with a 4 ’ x 12’ entry deck. One of the conditions of that approval required that an <br />updated survey be provided locating all existing and proposed stmcnires confirming setbacks at <br />the time the building permit application is filed. The updated survey confirmed that existing <br />detached structure was not located 3’ from the side lot line but 2’ 4". An amended variance <br />application has been required as applicant did not wish to offset addition 8’’ to the south of street <br />side of detached siiucture. New dimensional information of existing structures will also require <br />an adjustment in the final total of area for oversized accessory structure. The following <br />ordinances are pertinent to this review: <br />1.Section 10.03, Subd. 9 (C) (2). Variance to allowed lot area for an oversized accessory <br />structure. <br />Allowed = 1,000 s.f. <br />Approved with original variance application (#1775) <br />Amended proposal = 1.288.35 s.f. <br />Variance = 288.35 s.f. or 28.8% <br />= 1,273 s.f <br />2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (D). Side setback variance for oversized accessory structure <br />Required = 30 ’ <br />Proposed with original application <br />Proposed with ameikled proposal = <br />Variance = 27’ 8" or 92.6% <br />= 3’ <br />2’ 4" <br />List of Exhlbll.s <br />A - Application <br />A-1- Applicant’s Addendum <br />H - Plat .Map <br />C - Property Owners List
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.