Laserfiche WebLink
3. <br />4. <br />The Orono Planninu Commission reviewed ihis application on AueusI 16, UW. <br />and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon ihe lollowing <br />findings; <br />A.r;:h,:re%^7xrar::^ra <br />setback area. <br />B The sloping elevations at the building setback line and existing mature <br />'ear round vegetation nunimize the visual impact of the new structure <br />upon adjacent residences. <br />C. The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent neighbors <br />notified of the v;-riance request. <br />D. The steep lakeshorc banks will minimi/.e impact of structure upon lake <br />views from lakeshore. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this p.-operty are <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zomng cislria. tha <br />granting the variarute would not adversely affect traflk conditions, light M »r <br />W a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />!T“e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to a levute a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pres^e a <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent o. the <br />Zoning Cixlc and Comprehensive Plan ot the City. <br />The Citv Council lias considered this application including the findings and <br />^mimlendations of the l-lanning Commtsston. -rports hy Cny^sufi. co~ <br />by the applicants and Ihe effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the cmimunit). <br />Page 2 of 6