Laserfiche WebLink
MLNUTES OF THE ORONO TEANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HEM) At(;UST 16, 1993 <br />ZONINC; FILE #1846 - CONT. <br />Nolan added he saw a steep slope with hosta plants with mulch with fabric underneath the mulch <br />which was not part of the calculations. <br />Upiii said that wasn’t part of his property and was right-of-way of County Road. <br />Chair Schroeder suggested removals in the driveway and asked if that could help drainage <br />problems? <br />Mrs. Upin said they have tried ever> thing and that is why they recently repaired the driveway <br />because it buckles undemeatli from all the water. <br />Chair Schroeder asked if there is a way to remove comers by walkway. <br />Mabusrh asked about tlie hndscape areas. <br />Mrs. Upin stated there is .some in the front but there is no plastic near the house. It was done <br />strictly to prevent additional water damage. <br />Chair Schroeder stated there are possibly reductions of some additional 200’. <br />Mabusth asked the impact of removing concrete. She said already there is a reduction in the 0- <br />75 ’ of 3.3% and applicants did not propose any reductions in the 75-250*. You are asking for <br />tulditional removals and probably have 250 s.f. ot additional removals now. <br />C’.air Schri»eder said he felt it was a decent effort and because of the lot topography and special <br />draii’*‘?e concerns there is not a lot more to do. <br />It was mov 3 bv Schroeder, seconded by Peterson to approve Application #1846 for Alan and <br />l eslee Upin, . l onkawa Road, for the following variances - average lakeshore setback of <br />5 , lakeshore setba.V variance at 65’ for a 10 ’ variance, hardcover in the 0-75 ’ reduced by 200 <br />s.f to 394 s f., 75-2: ” reductions as indicated with a total hardcover somewhere closer to <br />5.tXX). Removals need to aunpleted prior to the beginning of the new construction. Aves <br />4. navs 0.