My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
08-23-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 1:30:17 PM
Creation date
1/9/2024 1:28:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends the following "site evaluation/system upgrade" lime frames for the <br />following types of projects: <br />1 <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Projects that are emergency repairs: 2 years/2 years. <br />Projects that are normal maintenance with no expansion of living space, square <br />footage or footprint (includes interior remodels): prior site evaluation/2 years <br />for upgrade. <br />Projects that expand living space or footprint of building (including those projects <br />that require immediate added capacity to system due to bedroom additions): <br />prior site evaluation/concurrent system upgrade. <br />For properties that already have a failing or illegal system: prior site <br />evaluation/system upgrade prior to any permit other than emergency repairs. <br />For projects in categories 2 and 3 above, when ground conditions do not permit <br />full site evaluation, a partial site evaluation shall be completed by a site evaluator <br />prior to building permit approval, and a permit shall be issued only under the <br />following conditions: <br />a. Site evaluator has identified probable sites for system upgrade that meet <br />setback and slope requirements for a system to fit the anticipated soil <br />conditions based on the Hennepin County Soil Survey and general <br />knowledge of the area. <br />b. Applicant must provide evidence of contract with site evaluator to <br />complete work as soon as ground conditions are suitable for testing. <br />c. Applicant shall agree in writing to complete the septic upgrade within the <br />normal "two year" or "concurrent" time frame for his type of project. <br />d. Applicant agrees in writing that construction project shall come to a halt <br />if site evaluation ultimately yields inability to upgrade the system; i.e., <br />owner acknowledges the risk in going ahead with the project absent <br />confirmation that system can be upgraded (staff to draft standard forms). <br />For all above categories, if site evaluation indicates that system upgrade to a <br />conforming status is impossible, no permit shall be issued until the situation is <br />resolved (City Council will likely be involved in these situations if they occur).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.