08-23-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LMCI) BOARD OF DIKFCTORS July 28, 199.1 Pape .1 - "Motion carried" should be added after the second f? a r a " r a p h . Pape .1 Parapraph 2 - The water level should he "929.8’". instead of ”929.6’". Motion carried unanimously. From persons in attendance on subjects not onPUBLIC COMMENTS the agenda. Thomas Wartinan, representing the Gideons Point flomcowners Association (HOA) requested reconsideration of the Board action denying the variance for Lots 1 through 5. He submitted a re vised plan for the boardwalk over the wetlands for Lots 1 and 2. The request included a reduction of the HOA boat density from 51 Boat Storage Units to 47 Boat Storage Units. He asked for refer ral of the new variance request to the next Water Structures Committee meeting on S/14, for a recommendation to be considered I)v the Board at its regular meeting on 8/25. LeFevere said that, because the Board has acted on the application, it would require a motion by a Board member to do anything with it. A motion to reconsider has to be made at the same meeting the original motion w'as made. A motion to rescind and/> a motion to alter the previous action would be in order. That type of motion could be made by any member, to be differen tiated from a motion to reconsider which requires the motion be made by a member of the prevailing siile. The motion to rescind or modify the previous action would require previous notice of • he proposed action, w i t li a majority of the entire body or 2/3 of the members present in favor. II the motion were to send the new application to the Water Structures Committee it would only require a majority vote of the members present. Babcock said the issue of a site plan for the entire devel opment shoreline which conforms to the Order issued for granting the Gideons Point Homeowners Association 1993 multiple dock license is pending before the Water Structures Committee. The Committee tabled action at the last meeting because the site plan was not submitted. Strommen said he does not believe the commit tee would be in any position to reconsider the application in view of the Order denying the variance on the west end. ^ MOTION: Grathwol moved. Foster seconded, to refer Mr. Wartman’s request to the Water Structures Committee. DISCUSSION: Babcock said the new dock license for the HOA is not complete until the missing site plan has been approved. He called for either a vote on the motion on the floor or a nio t i on to modify the variance. LeFevere said an alternative would be for a member to give notice tonight xhat there will be a motion to rescind at the next Board meeting. Johnstone asked if it is possible for Wartman to submit a new variance application. LeFevere said Wartman could start the whole process over by paying a new fee and having another pub 1 i c hearing. Hurr wondered if there is a time limit for asking for reconsideration. LeFevere said there is no such provision under the LMCD rules. LeFevere said the action the Board took was - continued