My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-1993 Council Minutes HRA2
Orono
>
Advisory Boards
>
HRA
>
1993
>
07-26-1993 Council Minutes HRA2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2024 1:49:59 PM
Creation date
1/8/2024 1:49:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 28. 1993 <br />is made, the City is responsible. <br />Jabbour expressed frustration over items that were ordered <br />incorrectIy. <br />Moorse noted the items that were missed in-the process wouid still <br />be the responsibility of the City, whether at tne beginning or now. <br />Jabbour felt there were items that the Counci I was not made aware <br />of that were installed, such as tne iocx change. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr, to direct staff to <br />remove all the changed locks and return for full credit. <br />Goetten asked staff for a reasonable explanation of the cnange. <br />Moorse suggested they reconstruct the chronology of events leading <br />to the change. <br />Kelley referred to a memo f rom Cecemoer 19 92 listing 26 items which <br />had not been funded for at the time. <br />Moorse noted the majority of those items have been provided at no <br />cost. He said the signage has not yet been reviewed by Council and <br />they will need to approve expenditure of additiona I money for such. <br />Kelley requested a status report on the 26 items. <br />Hurr suggested the architect and construction manager appear before <br />the Board to review the changes. <br />Jabbour noted it is difficult to determine if the changes are due <br />to design change or building flaws. He said he would like to put <br />an end to the issue, and added there will be no more approval of <br />additional items without going through the process. He withdrew his <br />motion and suggested they meet with the architect to clarify the <br />i ssues. <br />Callahan felt the solution was through negotiations with the <br />architect, and suggested they approve the change orders and review <br />further at their next work session. <br />Hurr withdrew her second to the motion. She felt if the suppliers <br />were paid, the City would lose leverage with the architect. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by <br />following amounts in change orders: <br />Allied Mechanical Change Order #3 <br />Callahan, to approve the <br />$2,701.00
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.