07-12-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning FUe #1821 May 10, 1993 Page 3 The original application was withdrawn when applicants pursued the builduig pemut tor the new construction and you should be aware that once a subdivision has been commenced, building petmiu cannot be issued for any new construction until the wbdivision has been ^proved. The former residence on the property (Lot 1) has been demolished. Accen As already noted, the access shall be shared via the private driveway outlot. Note accessory structure is only 5* from lot line. Private driveway outiot can bt reduced to 25 ’ in width. The City has no required standards for driveway ouUot widths. Applicants have advis^ that 14 ’ X 26.4* addition to the bam can easily be removed and Is in a serious state of disrepair. This would reduce the accessory structure to 627,9 s.f. requiring only a 10 setback. By teducine oudot width to 25', structure will meet required 10’ setback. Owners to immediate east had voiced concern that a driveway could be placed so close to a property line. The City has no standards for setbacks for private driveways to adjacent lot lines. In order to provide adequate distance from adjacent property, outlot may remain at a 30’ width along the portion that abuts the residence structure to the east and then reduced to a 25 ’ width as it approaches the accessory structure. Please review Exhibit H, the Engineer has recommended that the size of the culvert to be placed under the drive that extends southward be designed by an engineer in order to aswre that upstream storage is not increased. Access and utility ea.’tements will be taken at a 10’ width along all perimeter property lines. Drainage bncf Review Exhibits D and E, drainage was the major concern during ^ earlier 1990 review. Specifically, the area along the northwest lot line where drainage originally traveled northw^ collecting within the northwest comer of property be^ it drained through 12- culvert. Concern was raised because of the location of the septic site areas proposed for Lot 1 and the need to keep the flooding elevation below the 974.5. Upon applicato for the new residence, the qiplicants were required to install a new septic ^stem. If the principal dtainfield site was u> be used, the drainage improvements had to be completed. Drainage unprovemeois of the plugging of the 12" culvert, the installation of an underground tile and drainage swale icdirecting drainage to tributary to the south along the proposed shared lot line. Tte drainage way rniist be inaintained if the proposed septic areas are to rernainconfonning. Itwill be necessary to take a 20* drainage easement over the drainage way along the west lot line.