Laserfiche WebLink
* 93 hR I 17 j 31 ID: I rcR>OTd;Z^t“r I TEL n3 •&12 5/1 -77^-1 ^-•^Q c.'i:: <br />Hr. Kovin Staunton <br />Mb. Karan cola <br />junu 4, 1993 <br />paga 2 <br />1.Jaojc Rfualan purehaBod Lot 19 whara hi® hom® ia looatad <br />in 1974. <br />2.Ja«» Romlen purchasad Lot is (the Renien i/ot) in 1989. <br />3.The Renien Lot had bean granted a variance for <br />conatruction o£ a aingla fanily hone in February of <br />1984 which expired in February of 1985. <br />4.Anoroxiinately one year later the Renien Lot was again <br />granted an identical variance which ran fron January/ <br />1986 and expired January 1907. <br />5.Finally, an identical variance was again granted fron <br />February of 1987 to February of 1998. <br />6.Lot 18 appears to never have been in conaon ownership <br />with Lot 19 until 1989. <br />7.Lot 18 has never been legally conhined with Lot 19. <br />Saatad^e substandard siae of through any subdivision <br />Sie on his part. He acquired the Renien Lot Icnowing <br />prior building variances had been granted allowing tte RiniM <br />Lot as a separate lot, to be used for the construotlon of a <br />single family residence. At the tine Mr. Renien began <br />negotiating with Mr. Mertes for the purchase of ^ <br />Renien Lot was covered by orono variance No. 1101 • <br />In aach of the cases relied upon by the neighbors in position <br />to {fc! Binl.n*«>Lue»t for .nother varianeo, tha applicant <br />either (1) affimatively created the substandard lot; (ii) had <br />tnowledoe of the substandeurd nature of the lot prior to. /11.H was aware of the denial of prior variance <br />Sr iir^S applicant-o predece.eor in title cre.^ <br />JS2^IHS-4-n5ard nature of the lot. Meet importantly, none of the <br />eases cited by the neighbors in opposition ms a situation <br />tSI City “onell on thJao prior occaaien. nac grantad a varianca <br />for the Idantioal purpose <br />T-. V rltv of Kapleweodj 366 H»H.2d 624, 927 (Minn* App.^iugrloto^id^ Hadlimd crdated lil. own