Laserfiche WebLink
• = ! 17:3g ID: lUuRSCN =E=?NDT;iZPF?; TEL NCitlS •* ic.^ <br />I \ I li •> t > \ <br />r.i li -Nii > I - <br />/ \iri \ I 11» <br />A <br />^-\c- <br />1% I . • • <br />I. • • <br />. , I I I I <br />June 4/ 1993 <br />BSSn? BY FJl X - S94-S8dd <br />• / <br />Mr. X«vln P. Staunton <br />M«. Karan Colo <br />PophaB^ Kailc^ sciinobrich & KaufBan^ Ltd. <br />3300 Pipor Jaffray Tower <br />333 Soutn 9tn street: <br />Mlnnoapolls, MN 55402 <br />ft It ? Ovir Cliont* C» jaeJe Rtti&ien"3237 Caaco Cii.de <br />C*Remien Lot") <br />orono Zoning 7ila No* iBii <br />our Pile No. 13193 <br />Dear Mr. Staunton and Mb. Colo: <br />I would like to address tne issue of "undue hardship" aa it <br />relates to the Application for the Variance for tha nemlen <br />Lot. It appoared from tha city Council meeting of May 24, <br />1993, that the Council was unwilling to grant the requested <br />variance In the absence of a specific finding <br />hardship. First, it is again import^t to identify tte <br />three eleoonts necessary under Minnesota Law to establish an <br />undue hardship: <br />1 Tha propsrty in question cannot bs put to a <br />reasonable use without the variance. <br />2. Tha situation of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property and not <br />created by the landowner. <br />3, Tho variance, if granted, will not altar the <br />eseential character of the locality. <br />These are the olosonts as identified inof the city of Moorhead# 44fi N.M.2d 917, 923 <br />(Minn. App. 1989). <br />Tha Staff Report of May 27, 1993 <br />facts which are relevant to the undue hardship issue.