My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
06-28-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2024 11:25:34 AM
Creation date
1/5/2024 11:20:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
482
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Figge Memo <br />June 25, 1993,. * j <br />Page 2 <br />Approval of the sidewalk was based on the following findings <br />A. Installation of the walkway required no removal of trees as walkway <br />follows path of utility lines installed at the time of construction. <br />B. Installation of walkway had not required major land alteration but <br />followed existing grade except for alterations needed to level sidewalk. <br />C. Total width of paved walkway (7 ’) and paved drive at 12’ does not exceed <br />allowed 20’ maximum width for driveway allowed per covenants. <br />D.Based on limitations of offstreet parking space and the overall design and <br />needs of existing structure, cement walkway to street will provide <br />walkway access for visitors who park in Sugarxvood Drive. <br />3.Filling of depressed area to rear of house will have no impact on drainage to west <br />or east and will allow approved drainage plan to function by allowing drainage <br />from rear lot to flow to northeast along approved drainage route. Applicant will <br />file a conditional use permit witlrin the next month for drainage improvements to <br />define swale within the natural drainagew ay that exists within commons outlet and <br />nondisturbed area of existing property and property to immediate east. Exhibit F. <br />New members of the Council should be aware that the City approved an abbreviated <br />review process early in 1991 that allows the Planning Commission to assume the sole <br />responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding request to vary from the Sugar <br />Woods’ covenants. Each applicant is given the opponunity to appeal to the Council all decisions <br />of the Planning Commission. Applicants do not pay a fee and assume the complete <br />responsibility for the preparation of all requests before the Planning Commission. It applicants <br />wish to appeal a Planning Commission recommendation, they are placed on the Council agenda <br />for the followine Monday (the 4th Monday of the month). Please review page 4 of Exhibit E <br />that outlines the review procedure. Specific site conditions have been listed providing e.xamples <br />of necessary supportive infonnation in addition to exhibits and submittals to support the request. <br />ch <br />ii^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.