My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
06-28-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2024 11:25:34 AM
Creation date
1/5/2024 11:20:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
482
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MEEHNG <br />/6 <br />TO:Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members <br />Ron Moorse. City Administrator <br />JUN 2 8 1993 <br />env OF ORONO <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:June 25. 1993 <br />SUBJECT:Kenneth Figge, 2004 Sugaruood Drive - Request to Vary from Covenants of <br />Sugar Woods Planned Residential Development - Review of Planning Commission <br />Action <br />Please refer to the enclosed staff memo that further provides background concerning <br />resident’s request. Briefly, the resident seeks approval of a three part request to vary' from <br />covenants as follows; <br />1 Request to curve driveway in order to save mature trees within 50’ street <br />protected area. <br />To install sidewalk as shown on Lan-Dscape Design construction plan, dated <br />10/25/92. revised 11/20/92. Review Exhibit H. shown at a 7’ maximum width. <br />Sidewalk is proposed within 50’ front/street setback area where no such <br />improvement is allowed. <br />3.Filling of approximate 35’x25’ triangular shaped depression at a 10" depth to <br />create" positive drainage from rear of house and to allow drainage to flow via a <br />namral drainage path to northeast. <br />Planning Commission Action <br />The Planning Commission unanimously approved the three pan request as follows: <br />1. Applicant had demonstrated that curved drive was needed to save mamre trees <br />within 50’ undisturbed area. <br />Tlie paved sidewalk within the 50’ protected area was also approved. Width is <br />approved at a maximum 7’ width as shown on landscape plan submitted for this <br />review. <br />Approval was conditioned on the circular sidewalk and formal landscaping area <br />being omitted from area of road outlot in addition to the steps that end at the <br />street lot line. The portion of the paved walkway that encroaches within road <br />outlot shall be installed at existing grade level providing no interference with <br />snow maintenance equipment and snow storage. Tlic covenants specificaUy state <br />that the only improvement permitted within the 50’ street setback zone is a 20 <br />wide drivewav.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.