Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Tile <br />May 11, 1993 <br />Page 4 <br />Issues for Review <br />I.Ucking a hardship statement for hardcover excess of 3 + %, would members recommend <br />a hardcover variance under any circumstances? At your site inspection, please note the <br />driveway improvement and lakeshore yard improvements on proposed Lot 1. <br />2.What alternative form of development would you recommend for approval? Note <br />Alternate B may result in a slight area variance if shared access is required. It can be <br />minimized if access to Lot 2 via easement is limited to existing curb cut at Shore Hills <br />Road. Alternate A involves a reduction ol some 3,000 s.f. in area for a 20 x 150 drive <br />that would encroach Lot 2. Shared access would also be required. <br />Recommendation <br />To recommend approval of the two-lot Class III subdivision application ot Thomas L. <br />McCarthy finding that all LR-IB lot standards and shoreland development standards have been <br />satisfied and that there is adequate sewer and water to serve a new lot based on the following <br />conditions: <br />1.Applicant shall create an access and utilib/ easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot <br />2 to provide sewer service from existing service-Y in lakeshore yard. Adequate <br />care must be taken during the construction of the service line as sewer line is <br />located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. <br />2.Applicant to provide 10 ’ wide drainage and utility easements along all perimeter <br />property lines and 5 ’ along the shared lot line. <br />3.Upon application for a building permit, future owner of Lot 2 shall make payment <br />for a sewer unit and water unit charge based on the current fee schedule. <br />4.Determination as to the recommendation for a shared access. If a shared access <br />is required, there mav be a need to grant an area variance for Lot 1. If driveway <br />approach is restricted to the first 20 ’ within corridor, area of driveway easement <br />could be reduced to no more than 200 s.f. It may not have an impact on lot area. <br />5.Members recommendation concerning excess of hardcover within the 75--.0 <br />setback area w ithin proposed Lot 1. Are there hardcover improvements essential <br />to the use of the property, i.e. backout area for driveway apron, deck adjacent <br />to patio doors from indoor pool addition, access stairs from upper elevation doors <br />in lakeshore yard, etc.? <br />i