Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1201 <br />September 16, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Double frontage (through lots) have been proposed with this revision <br />in lot arrangements. Although the code does suggest these should be <br />avoidedr they are not prohibited and Lots 2, and 2, Block 1 will no <br />require variances. The reason for the placement of the spur road is <br />obviouu-need to intersect major drainageway, if j:oad was *^0^® <br />located, tree loss and preseration of natural amenities for building sites. <br />The only variance required with this subdivision is the customary variance <br />granted with the creation of a private road because all lots are not served <br />by a public road. <br />for all proposed accessory structures. <br />The engineer has reviewed the proposed access for the private road at <br />Old Crystal Bay Road and has found no problem. There is adequate sigh <br />distance at 325 feet in both directions. <br />The east/west road would appear to qualify for a 28 feet M.P.w. ai <br />north/south spur road for a 24 feet M.P.W. <br />b'=e“i\%”i"ua7d ”ur rcKe"ts\ <br />flows to the north. Staff has discussed the drainage path <br />with the engineer (Exhibit G). The City is concerned with adding more <br />drainage to an already sensitive watershed. The engineer will ® <br />specific recommendation regarding the need to provide retention on <br />site. The drainageway need only be designated at 20 feet but s <br />expanded as it nears the wetlands area. <br />Per Section 11.10, Subdivision 21 C - both roads must be individually <br />named because they each serve 4 or more lots. <br />have to determine the merits of naming the future through road Woodhaven <br />Drive per the directive of Section 11.32, Subdivision 2 E. <br />I