Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.. Jeanne Kabusth <br />May 17, 1993 <br />Pago 2 <br />, t-hn citv of Orono' 3 Zoning Chapter <br />W« interpreted thin provi lot met the ”80% rule” it could <br />to ntean that if a common lot, but that if could not meet <br />be considered a separa ^or^bined with the continuous lot under <br />the 80% rule it meet 80% of the city’s 1/2 acre <br />common ownership. ^ width minimum still meet the DNR <br />^^anda ”^d" Teel thi^ P/^^/^'^HoTevaT, we "^note °thr? Se^^ct^y’s <br />fthiB^foviaiSn cou'ld be clarified by adopting language <br />^Sr^LnSiete^Vvlth the DNR nodel. <br />iUWi- - - - - - -- -- <br />Therefore, since the «-ein lot doco^not^^^^^ <br />requirement, the city g ownership. A variance can bewith the adjoining lot under . demonstrate hardship (in <br />rcordance'witfMir. s\"a'’t. 46..3f7, subd. (R))- <br />Thanh you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at <br />772-7910. <br />Sincerely, <br />CJ) <br />Ceil Strauss <br />Area Hydrologist <br />cc: M Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist <br />Tom Zappia <br />Peter Bachman ^ .it« <br />City of Orono Shorelana riie