My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-14-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2023 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
12/29/2023 2:31:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 14, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1826 - CONT. <br />Goetten stated she appreciates the size of the proposed hardcover <br />removai and the fact that they need additionai storage. She said <br />in the past she has been very strict enforcing the OX hardcover in <br />the 0-75’ zone, but because of the vast benefit derived from the <br />removal of the tennis court, would be wiI Iing to ailow the lakeside <br />deck. <br />A neighbor presented the Council with a petition In support of the <br />variance and stated he felt the removal of the tennis court would <br />be an Improvement In appearance and drainage in the area. <br />KeMey >^:>'nied out a two car garage currently exists on the <br />property and the proposed garage, the owners would have four <br />stalls. He suggested they consider the removal cf the existing <br />garage. <br />Mr. Henson stated they have ruled out the removal cf the existing <br />garage because of the following: It provides privacy from the <br />County road, they have three vehicles, with the removal of the <br />existing storage shed they w!M need additional storage space, and <br />It would be very expensive to remove the garage as it has a very <br />thick concrete base. <br />Mayor Callahan questioned what they currently use for storage. <br />Mr. Henson answered the shed proposed to be removed is used for <br />storage, and the tennis court is used for parking of their vehicles <br />and boat In the winter. He added the house does not have a basement <br />for additional storage. <br />Kelley noted upon approval of other similar applications. It has <br />been the City’s experience that properties tend to accumulate <br />additionaI I terns. <br />Mrs. Henson stated the existing garage was built In 1978, and Is <br />maintained In perfect condition. <br />Mr. Henson said they have lived on the property for nine years and <br />can assure the Council they are not Junk collectors. He added, If <br />they are forced to remove the existing garage, they will not pursue <br />the project. <br />Mayor Callahan questioned if the application would be allowed If <br />the applicants were not proposing the removal of the tennis court. <br />Goetten stated it would have to be considered on Its own merits.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.