Laserfiche WebLink
conditions preventing c —'lanceSt11 about the parcel In question, emaina unimproved. Lot 18 is 300 In the lot appears to beto the north end south contained ing Park, and the Spring Park Is consistent with many, if not subdivisions, and appears to be knows of no lota in those tw<i r, which remains unimprovmed. se subdivisions, such as Lot 16 »n combined to form lots which in terms of width and zoning,> the immediate south of Lot 18, ave been improved. Since the h and south are both improved, wl^h the zoning code is not h the other lots, and, although n Lots 16 and 17, tho«?e lots oes not require Lot 18 in order tlrements of the Orono zoning Central Avenue and the >osaible in those directions to quirements of the zoning code. <br />Practical difficulty resulting egulations. ’ <br />rement of zoning regulations <br />g this land to any beneficial <br />sted variances. Lot 18 is <br />tiuction of a single family <br />able use other than that. As <br />this variance application, an <br />instructed on the lot without <br />'ack requirements. Municipal <br />'le, and indeed, the property <br />nents. in fact, the property <br />ndividual Luildable lot. For <br />was tazed at a market value <br />fs payable in 1982. Plainly, <br />iroperty is as proposed. A <br />width variances, therefore, <br />this lot whatsoever, <br />lity of the lot is emphasized <br />throughout the neighborhood. <br />‘ common throughout the two <br />ell as elsewhere along the <br />ners, however, this property <br />nque hardship of owning a <br />• v;v‘am/::/The proposed construction of a single family home on Lot 18 should have no adverse consequences for the neighborhood or neighboring properties. The lot is served by municipal sewer and water connections. No drainage problems, to my knowledge, ezist on the parcel. The use of the property will be in exact <br />conformity with the use of adjacent and neighborhood properties. <br />No material increase in traffic, pollution, or noise can be <br />anticipated from the proposed construction, nor will the proposed <br />home aeathetlcally differ from those In the neighborhood. In <br />sum, to the extent the spirit and Intent of the zoning ordinances <br />are to preserve and protect the residential character of this <br />district, the proposed variances promote rather than threaten that <br />result. <br />%i3