05-24-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-W• •* (#•' iV fe-MXNUVCS or TBS PLAMMIMC COMNZ6SXON fUBTlNC BBtO OCTOBBR 17, 1903' ♦ ♦ * ••761 DOUGLAS SMITH PACK 3- .*11. Th* conditions do not spply gensrally to other lander structuraa in the district and which said land is located. 12. the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoynent of a substantial property right of the applicant. I*' 13. The granting of the proposed variance will not in anyway impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or 14, Th<<t the granting of such var iance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is ^*^**®*^y alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. Hovegno seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (2). Minority Opinions - Callahan and McDonald - Callahan noted that the Planning Commission is looking at the common ownership Issue backwards and the City has an ordinance in effect that the Commission should follow. Collah'tn stated that the common ownership issue must be Solved before granting a variance. McDonald agreed with Callahan and she noted that there Is some neighbor opposition and that the common ownership issue should be solved first. #702 OLR OVBRBOB 4460 PORBST LAKK LANDING VAAIANCK Mr. and Mrs, Overboe were present. Mabusth noted that the applicant Is asking for a variance to place a detached garage in their limited front yard. Callahan asked if granting this variance would be an obstacle in the future if they plan on constructing a house on the other lot. Adams moved to approve Olt Overboes request for a variance for a detached garage to be placed 2’ fiom the given right of way, 15' from the side and 30’ from the travelled road based on the following findings; 1. Location of house on lot. 2.Substandard width 55* existing - zoning district standards asks for 140’ of width. 3. 4 . There is no additional land available. The house has existed for IS* years. i