My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
05-24-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2023 12:12:45 PM
Creation date
12/26/2023 12:08:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t v>Ci *Lu,*»'<«.‘lamming commission MtrriMC nsLO October it, 1983 prce ^9 r <br />mmm <br />Go«tt«n noted that the co*«on ownership Issue must be <br />dealt with before considering the variance request. <br />Coetten stated that if this lot was single separate <br />ownership that the variance request would be <br />reasonable and would not have s neqstlve effect on the <br />existing nelghborhobd. <br />Callahan agreed that the lot is buildable If the common <br />- - - - - - - <br />:;h;n''th.p>..ch.,.d e.. i.t tho <br />common cwn^ri^htp wasn* t a problem and the owner wasn t <br />able to foresee the common ownership in the future. <br />Habusth stated that Smith ^L-r^Sased tho lot from <br />Tuthlll In 1977 and that the common ownership was in <br />affect at the time of sale. <br />Rovegno noted that If the common ownership hadn't hcen <br />a problem that the application probably wouldn't have <br />any trouble receiving variance approval. <br />Ad.'ims moved to approve a variance request made by <br />Douglas Smith based on the 1RB% standards with a lot <br />area variance of 5.B32 sf or 23% lot area and lot width <br />45% based on the following findings: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />*>. <br />7. <br />8. <br />9. <br />m. <br />No available land - lots are developed on both <br />s IdcfS. <br />Sewer and water are available. <br />House and Improvemenla to be cc::-truc*icd vlthcut <br />need for additional varlanceSe <br />Applicant purchased property not knowing that the <br />ordinance limitations on development of Lot 18. <br />Variance being granted despite the common <br />ownership Issue. <br />By granting this variance there will be no <br />negative effect on the public health, safety and <br />welfare. <br />By granting this variance it Is consistent with <br />the development of the area. <br />By granting this variance there should be no need <br />for tuture hardcover and setback variances. <br />Planning Commission would like to note that the <br />garage 1 r. a non conforming structure ana subject <br />to ail pertinent ordinances. <br />Tl? special conditions applying to the structure <br />of land in question are peculiar to such property <br />or immediately adjoining property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.