10-17-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I or * ck 1 requires an lat as part of a Blk 1 (requiiredi ine at 35*): r «v#r Path to etch Plan nt to Horth icq of This fc.; #1 ......W Zoning File #1348 October 12, 1988 Page 2 of 6 Review of Application - The preliminary plat application now includes the rural property to the north owned by Mr. Hawkinson, refer to Exhibits C & D. This is the only change in property ownership from the original sketch plan presented for your review. All proposed lots are to be served by the plat road to be dedicated as a public roadway. Four of the proposed 30 lots will be served by surrounding public roadway. Lot 1, Block 3 (formerly Lot 58) is to be served via Wildhurst Trail. Developed Lot 9 and 11 and undeveloped Lot 10 to be served via Tonkaview Lane. Except for the 5+ acre Hawkinson property to the north, all of the other parcels are located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. It should also be noted that the 5+ acre to the north is located in the RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring 2 acres of minimum dry contiguous area. The newly proposed one acre lots will be served by sewer to be installed and paid for by the developer. Storm sewers will also be installed and paid for by the developer. In the original sketch plan, the City asked for an east/west connection to County Road 19. The applicant has returned with a proposal that shows a north/south connection, connecting to a 50* outlot proposed between the Hawkinson property and the West Branch Acres Plat. At a preliminary review conference with the City Engineer, it was agreed that the original request for the connectijig east/west was no longer necessary and consideration should be made for the total vacation of Highview Lane. Appropriate portions of Highview Lane may be retained for future sewer expansion. The City will ask for an additional 17*i' dedication for road right-of-way along Tonkaview Lane. The surveyor should confirm that areas are exclusive of the additional dedicated road area. The existing house on Lot 9 should be shown on the plat in order to confirm that the setbacks are met from the new division lines. Lot Configurations - Width variances are required for Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 as they are located on the curve of the road. This would be consistent in previous divisions where we have granted variances on curves or cul-de-sacs. Lot 10, Block 1 that achieves access via Tonkaview Lane, is platted as a flag let with a 75' wide corridor platted to the roadway. Sighting distance at that point creates no problem for the location of a new curb cut. The question for the Planning Commission - would it be consistent for the City to approve a newly created lot to be served with a new curb cut instead of by the interior plat road? Staff would recommend approval of this proposal based on the configuration of the property that is to be platted, the fact that proposed roads within the interior plat are to be public roads, the location of the wetlands along the north and east boundary of Lot 10, and the fact that the lot lines could be geri-mandered to provide a corridor to the interior road but the realignment would have a negative impact on the building sites of Lots 5, 8, and 7, Block 1. K 1 ■Vi i>v; \p A ZoningFile October 12, Page 3 of 6 Devel between Lo Lot 11.Aj area.one designated lot lines, wetlands si towards th< fact that 1 and 3,Blc applicant h 4,Block 5, portion of Branch Roae front of th a recent dii 4 and 8 rec Plan and a : further adv Sanitary Sev All 2 newer.As of extendi] not availa for sewer a and 11,Bl< within the capacity wi City will i Trail.Pie (Exhibit H sanitary s< packets.T to the nort infiltratio Historical1 carried by run-off to 1 the proposef