My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
10-17-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 11:09:55 AM
Creation date
12/20/2023 4:15:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Variance <br />7* or 29.4% <br />10 s.f. or 49% <br />is connected to <br />from the street <br />sd garager to be <br />rom the side lot <br />ifice space above <br />ith the 990 s.f. <br />,490 s.f. of floor <br />ly allowed In an <br />cated behind the <br />lie required front <br />pproximately 15* <br />, a garage is not <br />ops away from the <br />mt has noted that <br />2unounts of fill, <br />s on the property <br />irage as proposed. <br />• ••• <br />tm <br />Zoning File #1344 <br />September 28r 1988 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />it/ <br />Hardships to justify the additional requested variance for an <br />oversized garage in this case are not as well defined. However, the <br />applicants house is not extremely large, being about 1,200 s.f. on the main <br />floor and about 1,000 s.f. in the basement. There is no existing garage on <br />the property. Applicant's building permit application noted that the <br />garage will be used for cars on the lower level and storage or office on <br />the upper level. Lower level will have a work bench. <br />The neighboring property owners to the east, the Gabrielsons, who are <br />most affected by this garage structure, have acknowledged that they are <br />aware of the application but have made no comments to staff as of this <br />writing. <br />The proposed garage will use the existing driveway access location and <br />there are no sight distance problems associated with this location. <br />Planning Commission may wish to ask the applicant to address his <br />actual needs for the extra storage space and reasons why that space could <br />not be accomplished with an attached addition which would not need the <br />accessory structure floor area variance. It may be reasonable for the <br />Planning Commission to ask the applicant to explore alternatives to <br />creating this oversized accessory structure that has potential for uses <br />other than strictly residential. <br />Staff Recomiiendation - <br />If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances <br />requested, such approval would appropriately be granted under the condition <br />that the garage and attached space above it may never be used as a dwelling <br />unit, cannot be rented as a dwelling unit, may not have plumbing installed, <br />and the applic.’^nt should be advised that the property does not meet the <br />criteria for granting of a guest house conditional use permit. <br />m <br />CITY OF OF <br />Initial Ap <br />($50.00 <br />Renewal Va <br />(no char <br />After-the- <br />PROPERTY I <br />Site Addre <br />Property I <br />Please ch€ <br />Attach le« <br />required s <br />Ncuone <br />OWNER (if <br />Name <br />Addre <br />I (dc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.