Laserfiche WebLink
IIR 19, 1988 <br />3uld be other <br />story house. <br />McNeills were <br />conform to to <br />bated that is <br />Iden property" <br />.ey asked Mr. <br />11s answered <br />lardshlp. Mr. <br />Ip. Bellows <br />9 trees. She <br />the Prudden <br />1 end of the <br />ator Mabusth <br />t a lot line <br />to obtain a <br />1 the front of <br />eflnltlon of <br />r Is on or <br />the road was <br />Mr. McNeills' <br />of the front <br />site was not <br />isented. She <br />of variances <br />It the septic <br />rator Gaffron <br />icross on the <br />ison asked If <br />ponded In the <br />jject. Hanson <br />ig this matter <br />the 26' rear <br />shaped like <br />he proposal <br />' above the <br />»irould apply <br />triction of <br />sslon member <br />.em, not the <br />t explained <br />. Bellows <br />be retained <br />the narrow <br />.4. <br />wm <br />^ ;• I wii <br />II <br />» 19, 1988 <br />ZOHIHG the Planning Commission <br />width of ^ - 2.ot of space in which to build the <br />overlooked. pxanning Commission member Cohen stated that theproposed house. Plading of the restrictions prior to <br />applicant should have “^^^3 agreed, but said he did not <br />buying the 1°*. «=• “ dances. The 26* setback from the 10 <br />understand all turarise to him. Mr. McNellis reiterated the <br />easement came as a surprise v^rtuallv invisible. Bellows <br />fact to^Mr^^McNellis that the Planning Commission's concern <br />approach the variance problems. <br />It was »oved by .Planning ^ <br />bv Planning Commission member Bellows, <br />Motion, Ayes»5, Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1332 MARCELO GOMDCIO <br />980 PERNDALE ROAD WEST <br />apter -the-pact variances <br />PUBLIC HEARING - lls27 P.M. <br />\ <br />- 11:30 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicant's architect was present in lieu of the <br />applicant. <br />^ “,“sr.p'Ab".'vi.r.hV;5“.“c s“ iscrt“S“i!.?ss <br />the requirements was i^ed for the unprofessionalism of <br />applicant/owner should be P stated that he thought it <br />the architect. The <br />?fpnn^ila«%l^arp^fpo?int“ "iS^gu^idelines were not <br />specific as to those items. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />euld the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commission member <br />by Planning Commission member Hanson.^o reco^ nd pp <br />S'tKAJril'ASr .i" -rf-V;^yes*4, Kelley-Nay due to a lack of hardship. <br />m <br />b"’: ' : .A-'' <br />: : V -V* ■ <br />Wi <br />Pr<• m <br />Date <br />Subject <br />Applicat <br />to < <br />Zoning Dj <br />List of E <br />Exhi <br />Exhi <br />Exhi <br />Exhi <br />Exhi <br />Exhi <br />Exhi; <br />Exhi] <br />Exhi) <br />Pertinent <br />1.This <br />the 1 <br />easti <br />width <br />2.The I <br />setb. <br />apprc <br />revis <br />in or <br />and a