10-03-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e required lot width and ig that a shared access be id that Lot 5, to the rear id technically require a along Wildhurst Trail and rade are not prohibitive B the surveyor extend the he travelled road should :ilitate selection of the adequate width along the the Yorkto%m development. . in conjunction with the dry buildable envelope of that Intersects the lot innot be credited as dry 3 the property is sewered, i and Interpretation and a e of Lot 1. In reviewing urrounding propertyr the ling from the southwest, ng the roadway should be :he Yorktown development considerations are made of ess along wildhurst Trail )t 1 shall be determined i ditch within the lot. j of Garden Lane and all ion of the road improva- 3nt on the drainage needs :'s storm sewer plans are to be Installed by the if-way. Lots 5, 6, and 7 (review the as-bullts# inr the developer of Lot snslon of municipal sewer i is adequate capacity in its. ^ At’." H- f i in "lx Ivi ■m •V3 imm Zoning File 11327 September 28« 1988 Page 3 of 3 Staff laoo datioa - To table Application #1327, Arnold Soskin's preliminary plat of seven lots until the City cosiRletes a comprehensive review of the 30 lot Yorktown Development subdivision that surrounds the entire property. The issues surrounding this subdivision are dependant upon Yorktown Development s preliminary plans for drainage, access, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, lot grading, and Interior access plans. Upon completion of the compreheraive review, the applicant will be asked to dedicate additional drainage easements for surface drainage or storm sewer. In the meantime, the Planning Commission should advise the applicant on the following issues raised during this preliminary reviewt A. The need to approve lot width variances for Lots 5, 6, and 7. Note that the lot width is measured to the rear of the front yard setback line - 35* in from the street. Review the neccesary findings Section 11.02, Subdivision 10 A 1-7: X, Is the variance request excessive. The City consistently approves lot width variances for lots adjacent to cul-de-sacs. What are the hardships? 2. Are there undeveloped contiguous land available for combination with property? 3. Can the lots be reasonably replatted with a shared road that would reduce need for width variance? Greater tree removal will result in addition to increased hardcover. Planning C width variances. e)M*M Ission should respond to the above before approving the B. Resolve of the dry buildable envelope within Lot Is 1. Approve it as is; 2. Request a realignment of the ditch; 3. Lots 1 and 2 should be replatted as 1 lot. C. The applicant should advise if he plans to proceed with the formal vacation of Garden Lane as shown on the former Tonkaview Gardens plat as a 60' width. The City will only require 50'. Note the proposed reduction of right-of-way along the west lot lines. The applicant s surveyor should advise how the applicant wishes to proceed on the vacation of the 5' of right-of-way or will this be completed as a re plat with the total Yorkto%ra Development project. D. Applicant's surveyor to provide additional topographic information within Wildhurst Trail and designate existing blacktop road. '.ii. • ^.4-. ! -.1 •- mmm ml CITY crUSL% PROPERTY Id Site Addre Property I< Please che Attach leg RPPLICABT Name i Addre OWNER (if Name Addre (att BZZSTING L Numbo Devel Prase: Prase; PROPOSAL _ P M P I - •