My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-03-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
10-03-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 9:55:49 AM
Creation date
12/20/2023 10:40:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
457
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
>cated 4.3* from the <br />from the side lot <br />ed on the property, <br />ge is partially on <br />partially within <br />Iding resolutions <br />It is attempting to <br />Lned within those <br />dings. <br />nmenced the process <br />ires in question, <br />ig for each of the <br />plicaiit is in the <br />lents. <br />offices to obtain <br />that a variance to <br />ranted by the City <br />for either house. <br />on the property for <br />oning codes. The 2 <br />irs. Although the <br />his residence is <br />renovation (i.e. <br />location of 3865 <br />rovements to County <br />■rty line, and the <br />structures that are <br />for these 4 rental <br />to County Road 15. <br />: County Road 15 but <br />iccess to Dunwoody. <br />not have an access <br />the intersection, <br />an extremely large <br />property, A rough <br />)ver percentage for <br />the houses and its <br />cover percentage to <br />mfMm <br />m <br />'» ' •• • A- ■0: <br />iL% ■ : ' ■ <br />.limn I <br />'T- <br />4:.; <br />■ V?” :• <br />■ <br />mi <br />Zoning file #1336 <br />September 27, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Th. applicant U »<^visea that should the ^vaHance ^^^^granted ^to ^al lo^ <br />............................................ <br />Planning Commission may wish to <br />phase out of 1 unit chtainly has gotten his money out of <br />expenditure for property maintaince. <br />”*"ce“S^”rapplicant <br />2 principal structures on a ^ such*^a* situation not allowable. This <br />r, :ft^a ‘n:n«nVo\-7nr?e Situation, since it is a residential use in a <br />resTHehtial zoning district. <br />1 i-hA variance to allow renovation of both structu^res Approval of the ® .i-o result in non-hazardous <br />make both structures more per » t^ variance to renovate the second <br />buildings. On the “ther hand denial property owner <br />structure could have 2 possible tesu , could request to make <br />removes that structure, and the o b | since the property is <br />the second structure into *" ^ reasonable to consider the <br />only about 4/18 of an acre, non-rental guest house. Ultimately, <br />option of making the second building a agreement with the property <br />own“ :reffecfS"l"t ^emovfl" of t^liis second structure after some defined <br />"grace period." <br />. 1 <br />4 <br />. x : .,Vi- <br />hi.-- liv <br />CITf OF <br />... Initial <br />($50. <br />"'Renewal <br />(no c <br />After-t <br />Set <br />0th
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.