Laserfiche WebLink
ninistrdtor <br />Drive - <br />2 acre^ Sewered! <br />of 2 rental houses <br />It is unlawful to <br />iicture or use any <br />or which is not in <br />per lot. Except in <br />I as provided for <br />all be located on a <br />manufactured home <br />ds or an existing <br />constructed. Such <br />hs, any extentions <br />ipon issuance of a <br />ind such structure <br />r This Area <br />s <br />4 rental houses on <br />, The property in <br />id as 3865 and 3875 <br />ilt in the 1920*s, <br />truction of those <br />3f renovation work. <br />mmrmm <br />-V <br />i <br />i <br />-r; <br />iL <br />F <br />!! <br />r <br />t; <br />MiirtfeiwitA <br />Zoning File #1336 <br />September 27, 1988 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />3. Note from the survey that 3875 Shoreline is located 4.3* from the <br />side lot line and that 3865 Shoreline is located 2.8* from the side lot <br />line and about 6' from the County Road 15 right-of-way. <br />4. There were 2 detached garages previously located on the property. <br />The smaller of the 2 has been removed. The other garage is partially on <br />3877 Shoreline, partially on the lot in question and partially withini <br />County Road 15 right-of-way. <br />5. Please refer to Exhibit G, Haxardous Building resolutions <br />affecting these two properties. At this time, applicant is attempting to <br />comply with the requirements for upgrading contained within those <br />resolutions, in order to avoid having to remove the buildings. <br />DISCUSSION <br />In January 1988, Building Inspector Tom Jacobs commenced the process <br />for hazardous building action on the two structures in question. <br />Resolutions ordering Abatement of Hazardous Building for each of the <br />properties were adopted in January 1988, and the applicant is in the <br />process of attempting to comply with these City requirements. <br />However, when the applicant appeared at the City offices to obtain <br />permits for the necessary work, he was informed by staff that a variance to <br />Section 10.03, Subdivisions 4 and 7 would have to be granted by the City <br />Council before staff could issue renovation permits for either house, <br />hence this application. <br />The 2 houses on this single lot have been located on the property for <br />many years, and were apparently constructed prior to zoning codes. The 2 <br />houses have been used as rentals for a number of years. Although the <br />property owner is technically an absentee landlord, his residence i_£ <br />adjacent to the rental units. <br />One of the City's concerns with allowing the renovation (i.e. <br />enhancing the permanence of the structures) is the location of 3865 <br />Shoreline near the County Road 15 right-of-way. The improvements to County <br />Road 15 have brought the traveled roadway near the property line, and the <br />County has gone on record as opposing any renovation of structures that are <br />within the right-of-way, such as the 20x24 garage. <br />Another issue to consider is the access situation for these 4 rental <br />houses. They are served by 2 driveways, both accessing to County Road 15. <br />Mote that 2405 Dunwoody, which does not technically abut County Road 15 but <br />does abut Dunwoody Avenue, does not have a driveway access to Dunwoody. <br />From a safety standpoint, 2405 Dunwoody probably should not have an access <br />to Dunwoody since that access would be too close to the intersection. <br />However, because the access is a shared one, there is an extremely large <br />percentage of gravel driveway hardcover on the 3865/3875 property. A rough <br />calculation by staff indicates that the 75-250* hardcover percentage for <br />3865/3875 is about 55%. Obviously, elimination of 1 of the houses and its <br />associated parking and driveway needs would reduce hardcover percentage to <br />more closely conform with Orono's hardcover requirements. <br />• • ' 't *~mr <br />N • <br />4 <br />1 -S' :■■■■ :u <br />h V' ■■ <br />t'.: <br />Zoning File <br />September 27 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />The app <br />both structu <br />water meter, <br />been made s€ <br />Planni <br />phase out ol <br />to be agree <br />this proper <br />expenditure <br />STAFF RBCOM <br />Certaii <br />2 principal <br />to adoption <br />is not a no <br />residential <br />Approv <br />make both s <br />buiIdings. <br />structure • <br />removes tha <br />the second <br />only about <br />option of m <br />staff would <br />owner to e£ <br />"grace per: <br />t <br />♦ ^