Laserfiche WebLink
'tmm <br />red substandard <br />It lots if the <br />:hout variances <br />.Idable because <br />e that time has <br />thout variances <br />yi/75. <br />p through the <br />substandard <br />current Code <br />substandard <br />>ff separately <br />in't get two new <br />59 made Parcel <br />re# he had the <br />Parcel 3) from <br />buildability <br />It parcels (but <br />he didn’t sell <br />not buiIdable <br />ithout Council <br />nd applied for <br />ere would be no <br />ces to the area <br />be related to a <br />nless he proves <br />reel 2 when his <br />the right to 2 <br />ht only to one <br />e right bo only <br />Zoning File #990 <br />May 29, 1987 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />staff has been able to locate no *.hf'citv%^er Jven <br />the rwd right-of-way as part of his lot areas. <br />Staff ftecowBendatiofi -> <br />The Council’s procedural options are as follows: <br />1 f-Ha f^Anial resolution as drafted. In this case, Mr. Ferrell <br />iiu “?ave''to wa"it 6 »o‘nth"."^fore he ~uld reapply for the variances, <br />if he so wished.- per Section 10.08, Subdivision 5. <br />reheard in May 1987. <br />3 Allow the applicant to revise hie application to a <br />buildin7-»ite request, if he wishes. «hich son.e members of v.ouncil <br />have indicated would be looked "P°" or Jdopt a <br />S^lc?^r^“e r\^"errld‘llck“fthfpian'nin^ C^mmi'^io^n ^o^/urt^er <br />review. <br />staff would suggest the following language ^ incorporated into the <br />resolution as finding #41 if you the applicant was <br />l^visVd "o‘’f%hi%t!SS:^^"a?tine° ifTe%a> <br />evllence to submit; or b) to revise his ®PP“<=V=\°Ud°it\Tal lo?s^^ or additional lot on the 2.9 acre parcel instead ^-additional lots^ or <br />c) choose neither and waive any right to °/^th^^ <br />application by the City Council. The applicant chose to wai <br />Council review of the application. <br />i <br />K-:: <br />« <br />y