Laserfiche WebLink
lot containing 2.1 <br />drainage easement <br />orth Brown Road)# <br />em is not as shown <br />and system located <br />rom and at a much <br />at all similar to <br />»rmit or granted a <br />ts in an unsewered <br />est# if approved, <br />r substandard lots <br />:lon. <br />sewered lots to be <br />lest to keep sewer <br />elation to codes <br />ber 13, 1985 for a <br />md how changes in <br />met or nearly met <br />1959, the Council <br />nt variances for <br />ing that commonly <br />and Inferred that <br />St ordinance with <br />arily deprive the <br />of last meeting's <br />e. by stating that <br />substandard size <br />are concerns were <br />iropriate for sub- <br />minimum width, and <br />s for unsewered <br />, septic OK, meets <br />ring) that common­ <br />er application for <br />establishing City <br />mm <br />mmm <br />d <br />mm <br />■: - V ■■mm- <br />f- <br />% <br />'m <br />m my P«R^r- <br />Zoning File #990 <br />May 29, 1987 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />.. «4>*ted that unse%rered substandard <br />C was « -- - - - - - - - <br />staff balieve^ that „*^av biildabll'bacauae <br />-e Zonin, Code. <br />« been unbuildable without variances <br />Since^^r/Trr buVVa."h‘uiiIab“^ithout variance, prior to l/i/75. <br />_ ^ ^ M ^ ^ i m Ak Am Ml '-- - - - - - -- - w W 4-Ka <br />Each zoning Code *5°“ d”t?ft‘'coL“^^^^ ^ub?Wnd«d <br />zoning Code effective 1/1/75 for variances. The cur^t C^? <br />unsewered lots were not to io„able terms that a substandard <br />effective 4/1/84 "Ot be sold off separately <br />.. 4. -e v.rrell's ’loss" if he doesn't get two »•*III. Regarding the eatent of Ferrell s <br />boi Iding sites. <br />staff believes that ““ *o'i t" be ing "l*e m than^l^acre, he had the <br />2 undoubtedly not buildable due lot (Parcel 3) from <br />buildability right to “wwys to^ t^^^^ h«» buildability <br />9 ww —— - 1 /K <br />Ferrell would have had the right sellnot arbJildable lots) to other parties prior to 4/1/84^ buildable <br />SSU and as of 4/1/84 the Code says_ they without Co;mcU <br />without variances,and can t be soia o 4/1/84 and applied for <br />aooroval.^ And even if he of 10/26/84, there would be no <br />variances, e°t°tding to Alan 0 so * „bing the variances to the area <br />basis, hardship, or 3““tifwould logically be related to a <br />requirement. Any "loss Staff suggests that, l*y ® <br />taking of rights he has always ha • variance for Parcel 2 when his <br />that the City formally granted « tiL never had "he right to 2 <br />subdivision occurred in i”® 12/31/74 had the right <br />additional lots, to the present has had the right cv on.yadditional lot, and from 1/1/75 to tne p <br />the existing developed building site. <br />m <br />4 <br />U <br />If V! <br />Zoning File <br />May 29, 1987 <br />page 4 of 4 <br />Staff : <br />granted to <br />reviewed hi <br />wording of <br />however, th <br />mention of i <br />that the Cit <br />recognized <br />1955 Code a <br />the road ri< <br />Staff Re <br />Attach< <br />Ferrell to « <br />The Coi <br />1. Adc <br />would <br />if he <br />2. Tal <br />if the <br />evider <br />and ap <br />rehear <br />3. A1 <br />buildd <br />have i <br />Counci <br />revise <br />but fi <br />recomn <br />Februa <br />would <br />commit <br />would <br />appli' <br />review <br />Staff <br />resolution <br />41. / <br />advis <br />evider <br />additi <br />c) cl <br />applic <br />Counci