My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1988 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
09-19-1988 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2024 9:16:25 AM
Creation date
12/14/2023 1:59:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rr-lPjp .\_v <br />listrator <br />5t - <br />fiuatlon of <br />exclude the second <br />s revised the lot <br />1/88 <br />tion's Letter <br />ions <br />n Feasible <br />bover to include <br />sting house. The <br />:ond lot or as an <br />propriate if the <br />instructed on the <br />tionr to make the <br />built without an <br />ant effect on how <br />bhis initial one- <br />roposal to divide <br />3 parties looking <br />ms <br />mi <br />S' <br />Zoning File #1301 <br />September 15» a988 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Note al.o that per Planning Coumlaslon-s apparent attitude «<= the July <br />meeting, that a single division just to split off the house <br />received in a more positive light than if additional lots are considered a <br />this time. A topographic map has not been provided. <br />Access Sites and Area Developmentj. <br />ri:%n:n‘r -u/r;, r <br />Bayslde Road at the northeast corner of the property. There are "^nce <br />access locations that strictly speaking would meet the <br />th^e two points would encroach into the two acres of dry “* <br />necessary for the proposed lot around the <br />northerly of the two access points is much closer to the County Road <br />19/county Road 84 intersection than the County would like to •«*' <br />would involve a major revision of the right turn lane on County Road 19. <br />for the White house. The access point south of and a j K.nce <br />existing driveway was determined to be a very unsafe access <br />would not be a reasonable location to consider for placement of a futu <br />road. <br />Given the above information, staff has put together another Area <br />Development Diagram that hopefully gives a conceptual idea as to how the <br />oring properties might develop. <br />It appears that no dedication for private roadway would be <br />in the area of the existing house. It would then seem appropriate to <br />require future roadway dedication only upon an application for subdivis on <br />of the parcel remaining after the house is divided off. <br />% <br />Zoning File <br />September j <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />I wou] <br />the Armsti <br />developmei <br />Armstrong ( <br />on the eas' <br />by a cul-d <br />extremely <br />extension v <br />City's Roac <br />At th; <br />road from # <br />to County 1 <br />be with pr <br />private roe <br />road const! <br />the lots <br />individual <br />outlot ext< <br />As is <br />outlots on <br />Drive/Si1^ <br />providing t <br />Staff Recoi <br />Consic <br />subdivisioi <br />line to di <br />and given <br />houser sta <br />applicant <br />exception <br />^ appears uni <br />maintain a <br />gerrymandei
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.