Laserfiche WebLink
*at0r^.'m:'' <br />’r <br />.U-*. <br />& •> - .: il <br />ier needs to be <br />on our property <br />the woods and <br />Mr. Rebers should <br />ability insurance <br />damages to <br />th Brown Road. <br />Dgress. However we <br />Orono is progress, <br />residential to <br />the community of <br />'•esidential property <br />■ 4 <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Michael P. Gaffron# Asst Planning 4 Zoning Administrator <br />September 15r 1988 <br />#1301 Fredrick White, 180 North Shore Drive West ~ <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review - Continuation of <br />Public Hearing <br />Application - The applicant has revised his request to exclude the second <br />building lot from consideration at this time, and has revised the lot <br />lines for the parcel to contain the existing house. <br />Zoning District - RR-IB <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit P <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit H <br />Notice of Planning Commission Action 7/21/88 <br />Glenn Cook's Letter of 7/15/88 <br />Hennepin County Department of Transportation's Letter <br />7/27/88 <br />Staff's Sketch of Potential Access Locations <br />Conceptual Area Development Plan Based on Feasible <br />Access Locations <br />Memo & Exhibits 7/14/88 <br />Revised Preliminary Plat Drawing <br />Planning Commission Minutes of 7/18/88 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicant has revised his proposal, as noted above, to include <br />creation of just a separate 2+ acre lot to contain the existing house. The <br />remaining parcel could then be designated as either a second lot or as an <br />outlot.* Note that designation as an outlot would be appropriate if the <br />City's intent is to not allow a separate house to be constructed on the <br />large parcel without further subdivision. The reverse option, to make the <br />large parcel Lot 2, would allow a single residence to be built without an <br />additional subdivision, and would have potential significant effect on how <br />a future subdivision might occur. <br />The applicant states that his intent is to complete this initial one- <br />lot subdivision now, then perhaps come back later with a proposal to divide <br />off a second lot. Applicant notes that he has interested parties looking <br />at the large parcel for possible development. <br />W <br />Zoning Fil <br />September <br />Page 2 of <br />Note <br />meeting, <br />received i <br />this time. <br />Access Sit <br />The a <br />the poten <br />County re <br />there is <br />Bayslde R< <br />access Ic <br />requiremei <br />those two <br />necessary <br />northerly <br />19/County <br />would inv< <br />Thos <br />other acc <br />developm> <br />and the o <br />for the <br />existing <br />would nol <br />road. <br />Givi <br />Developmc <br />ne-tih-vri <br />It a <br />in the a: <br />require f <br />of the pa <br />■/ .*i