09-19-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..■4 BUT (\S 1 AM LL NOT BE ABLE ME. I HOPE THAT FOR SITTING IN IS THE PERSON HAN MYSELF OF OBJECTIONS TO OMPLETION OF IDEA FOR THE 3R MY FATHER. HAS BEEN :^ND BAD DAYS. SPRING. HE DUND HIM VERY D WATCH ABOUT rHEN CHANGE THE MAN, I TRIED TO TO DESIGN A DECK MORE DECKS FOR SEEM TO FOCUS HIS URCHASE THE ER, WE STARTED TO TOR CAME BY AND TOP WORK ORDER. STOPPED WORKED MET WITH THE ICATION AND COMPLETED. IT : PROJECT., THE :URATE DIAGRAM ANY OTHER HARD '■n .-i ■■ .t- h: J .ii:v 1% CITY^ QRONO DECK FERHIT PAGE »2 HAD ALL OF THIS ZI^TORMATION, ABOUT 10 DAYS TO TWO WEEKS AFTER THE ORGINAL STOP WORK ORDER, I MAILED EVERYTHING THAT I HAD TO THE CITY. THE NEXT TIME THAT I HEARD FROM ANYONE REGARDING THIS MATTER WAS THE JULY 22nd LETTER FROM LYLE OMAN. NEEDLESS TO SAY I WAS MORE THAN UPSET. I CALLED THE CITY AND THEY ADVISED ME THAT THEY NEVER HAD RECEIVED MY ORGINAL SUBMISSION AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO AGAIN FILE ALL OF THE NEEDED FORMS. WHAT HAPPENED TO MY ORIGNAL FILING STILL STUMPS ME AS I NEVER RECEIVED IT BACK AND COULD ONLY ASSUME THAT IF I SENT IT TO THE WRONG ADDRESS IT WOULD BE RETURNED. AFTER AGAIN COMPLING ALL OF THE INFORAMTION WHICH YOU NEED, I HAND DELIVERED THIS INFORMATION. IN MY EARLIER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION, I WAS ALSO INFORMED OF THE $150.00 FILING CHARGE. THIS WAS NOT INCLUDED IN MY FIRST SUBMISSION AND I BELIEVE THAT IS WHERE THE PROBLEM ACTUALLY AROSE REGARDING THE •'LOST'* FIRST SUBMISSION. THAT BASICALLY BRINGS US UP TO DATE. THERE ARE ABOUT FIVE HOURS OF WORK LEFT TO DO ON THIS PROJECT. THE PEOPLE LIVING ON CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. CERTAINLY, A DECK FACING THE LAKE DOES NOT INTERFER WITH ANY AETHCTIC DESIGN WHICH THE CITY FATHERS MAY HAVE FOR THE LAKE FRONT. IN FACT THERE ARE VERY FEW LAKE FRONT PROPERTIES IN THIS AREA WHICH DO NOT HAVE AT LEAST A DECK EXPOSURE FACING THE LAKE. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A LAND SURVEY I THINK THAT I HAVE COMPLETED ALL OF YOUR REQUIRED FORMS. I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME THAT PAYING $600 TO $G00 FOR A LAND SURVEY FOR A PROJECT WHICH COSTS UNDER $600 TO COMPLETE IS AN ONEROUS PRICE TO PAY FOR SUCH A SIMPLE PROJECT AND THAT YOU WILL WAIVE THIS REQUIREMENT. LASTLY I WOULD THINK THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME, A SLOTTED WOODEN DECK DOES NOT HAVE MUCH OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL INPACT. IN FACT, I FAIL TO SEE WHERE THERE IS ANY MEASURABLE CHANGE ON THE RUNOFF PATTERNS OF MY PROPERTY DUE TO THIS NEW EXPOSURE. i CERTAINLY HOPE THAT WE CAN PUT THIS SITUATION TO BED. I KNOW THAT THERE MOST or MUCH WEIGHTIER PROBLEMS WHICH YOU SHOULD GO ON TO. MV SIMPLE DESIRE IS TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT AS SOON I CAN AND BE ABLE TO ENJOY THE LIFESTYLE THE LAKE PROVIDES THE RESIDENCE OF OUR AREA. NCERELY, 'JON W. PAPAS 3369 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD ORONO, MN 55391 r-t- Cr.'* rT‘ ■JT'. w ■\V; To: Mict Date:Sepi Subject:«13: Cone Zoning Dietrie Application ~ List of Bzhibi Exhibit f Exhibit E Exhibit C Exhibit n Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Discussion - The appld 0.6 acre in ar< wetland to cr width, or abou The gradi and south side The appli at about l,00i amounts of fil before and afl decrease by 9%,