02-16-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

u o n n d e t SMPffSte?! Wm »iiii ■'*: - *-.•' ■•'■ ■. ■ !r .:';►••• d ^■ ■ V.' mm:^m teftS::'”:"- ' . ■ , • . ■• ■• ■ V . ■;^-yggSid'd'fd^ ^ . '2l*‘ ^ " •";'t>iyi^ *►-''' ■r-':''. ■•' ■...' : •*'^'■)i \r-mmm::»■■ ■ ;:■ ■ •• . •. •.'! :.i ■- ‘i-vii'-" ' ■ ■ Mmmn .^.:.='.',j'-V::';,,'-». ■ ,;■■« ‘y. y:y Mymm ''^■s;:Zoning File #1240 February 11, 1988 Page 3 of 6Revieir of Variance -Accessory structure:Front Setback West Side East Side Rear Existing75'24.1'109* 37' Proposed—9^117*122.5' 22* A rear setback structure/storage area for the accessoryvariance is requested ___ __________ , - The accessory structure as it sits now meets the requirements in the zoning code. The reason for moving the structure is to Improve traffic flow around the principal structure and provide more area for the drive-thru. Parking Variance: Drive-in establishment » 1 parking space per each 15 s.f. of floor area 705.51 s.f. (blJg s.f.)/15 s.f. » 47 parking spaces Required *» 47 Proposed >■ 20 Variance ■ 27 or 57% After staff review and Planning Commission comments at the January 27, 1988 meeting, all concurred that the formula for this use is excessive. Therefore, staff polled other cities in the area to find out their standards. The results of this poll are as follows: Minnetonka - 1 stall per 60 s.f. Maple Grove - 1 stall per 150 s.f., 15 stalls minimum Plymouth - 1 stall per 15 s.f. service area Eden Prairie - to be determined by City Manager After reviewing these requirements from other cities, staff feels tha 20 stalls will be appropriate for this use. The City Engineer has reviewed the 1st plan submitted (Exhibit K) and corrections have been made to the revised plan, with exception of the 5* setback to the east lot line. Applicant has stated that if parking is held back 5' from lot line, his will affect his traffic flow around the building and for the drive-thru. After looking at the traffic flow, the 5' setback will provide only a 13' to 14* lane (see Exhibit M). Stacking at the menu board will allow only two autos before the lane is blocked. Applicant must maintain minimum of 20'+ lane width to provide double lane around menu board and stacking autos (also see Fire Code review). Curbing shown on the plans should be parallel with the front of the auto as shown on Exhibit M - Parking Stalls 16 through 20. Curbing should be provided which will maintain the landscaping and define the entrances. S'- ■ > ■■■ ' '.1. '■'y'y'M' '. <M • ■a ** ■ j ' :M m M .. . . . ....V:/ '.i'' - x- mi Kill Wm. i'.y;.TSs ■i- v V ■ ; ; ? >:i' 0^y ’■M-' i. .* .. V.l\‘. 311 mmm'Sili\: - r-. :Bm K- mBMmBPM liWiammmym ■ •':.i i-: Zoning Pi] February ] Page 4 ofParkj Curbing a structure.Access:The a other for Engineer a are as fol City Henne It 7 increase The City i of-way a] rlght-of-i Accesi "entrance" Landscaping Green 1. So of tHe mmm ■ ■ ■ . ' ■_ _ _ _ y-'mm