02-16-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lng Administrator< Dettloff,III> - Second Review (Specifically A & P) mm--- B of 11/16/87 ds c-^y v' •v-.r-'--.--; i application was tabled pending Rptic system within Lot 1# need ine providing a future access ime point in the future, and fivhin Lot 2 not currently shown " ■ i-i llmlnary purchase agreement with rs, has been executed pending In preliminary discussions with Ef was advised that there was no ructure nor make any use of the realign the lot line appears no ' the new owner to subdivide the i a lot line rearrangement. In driveway as a shared driveway e. The subdividers and future the alignment for future access s further subdivided, that the oved for additional lots. The ,s a DNR protected wetlands end d via adjacent properties. The clearly state that the present 'O-lot use level. If Lot 2 is easement is not acceptable. rU-ir;^ E.Vv-::t jtaff clearly cannot recommend the year. This need not delay ecommend against granting final of the exact location of the proposed lot ’'ne. Per Section lanual Section 3 (A) (Exhibits A ized until the septic standards applicant has already submitted Lot 1. jMmm m W^mmss r’.‘. ;V mMsm mrnmm.1 ■'•"'•' /I a 'mmyym■■ vi- V }:•' ^ imMM . '55® ;* - ' i'\ mm-"’’; :3l C.V ■■ -.V,;.: mmm f^v v.•• .*:* • v^.* *.V '= !• ^5:; . -V. ; ., : r -'V^ ;. ■■•mmm K5*.'i;wv-;;"5T?-'5-55|'a;:i;;Pile #1218 February 10, 1988 Page " of 2 m-MThe resolve of the issue of the Kilkenney soils classified as wetlands located to the east of Lot 2 must also be determined later in the spring. Early spring will be the perfect time for staff to determine the true soils classification.wmrnstaff will also ask that you make the determination regarding a penalty fee and to review once again Section 11.02, Subdivision 11 (A)(B)t(C). In light of the history of this application. Planning Commission may feel it more appropriate dividing the penalty fee between the two applicants. m.:. Larry Berg, attorney for Cedrick Dettloff, has advised staff that there is a State law that would prohibit the City from asking for dedication of road right-of-way with a two-lot plat. Staff has asked Mr. Berg to submit the State law for the City Attorney's review and comment. As of this writing the City has received no Information from Mr. Berg. Per Section 11.32, Subdivision 1, the City will ask for the dedication of roadway aajacent to the subject property for Orono Orchard Road. Staff Re ndatlon: To approve the preliminary subdivision application of the Estate of Ruth Smith/Cedrick Dettloff finding all pertinent standards of the RR-lB zoning district have been satisfied for a two-lot plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval, the owner of Lot 1 shall confirm the exact location of the septic system that serves the existj-ig residence. 2. In early April, the City staff will confirm the exact classification or soils type of the designated wetlands within Lot 2. If this creates a delay for the applicants, the wetlands may be defined on the plat as shown on designed wetlands maps of the City in order to determine if the wetlands need be defined as drainage easements on the plat. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the City must receive full penalty fee payment (double subdivision application fee, an additional $250.00). .? 4. Future owner of Lot 2 is hereby advised that if Lot 2 is developed into two or more lots that the existing shared drive shall not be approved as legal access and that an access corridor will have to be provided via an adjacent property. Access cannot be provided via the designated wetland within Lot 2, located adjacent to Orono Orchard Road, as it is a protected DNR wetland. ■ un If vl-J