Laserfiche WebLink
>ip <br />■’f •'■WPf••.(:■ <br />mm <br />. ;A^::.v/v.v:.:/-:-^^;.-..-I <br />;' ■ -.V v^,:: ''---•..'••■ ■ .:;-v <br />,;" ^:v"’^]': ■•■’^'-. Vy <br />r ' '■■■:.^ r-V-- ^.-■. • <br />|WKw?®*l'.‘•-:.;rr;H:*; <br />V>i' <br />:V- V:^rjSiSsii <br />HGI^i,M*'; ■;■ ■.s;ii <br />;^r-.:.;'Vvv;v': <br />'■ •^••' ■ •-'.../ •■■ •■ ■■■■■'. % . <br />V:^;v .- ■ <br />fSiifiSi <br />K>*-: 'Wv -i:m <br />Date:Subject:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonJeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning AdministratorFebruary 10r 1988#1218 Estate of Ruth Smith/Cedrick Dettloff,38^ Orono Orchard Road South -- Preliminary Subdivision (Class Iir> - Second ReviewList o£ Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Section 12, Subdivision 4 (Specifically A & F) <br />Exhibit B - Septic Design Manual (3A) <br />Exhibit C - State Code Table 4 <br />Exhibit D - Gaffron Memo & Sketch <br />Exhibit E - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/16/87 <br />Exhibit P - DNR Map - Protected Wetlands <br />At your November 16, 1987 meeting, the application was tabled pending <br />resolve of the location of the existing septic system within Lot 1, need <br />for the realignment of the shared lot line providing a future access <br />corridor for Lot 2 if developed at some point in the future, and <br />determination as to the type of wetlands wi*-hin Lot 2 not currently shown <br />on the preliminary plat. <br />Edward Callahan has advised that a preliminary purchase agreement with <br />the MacMillians, adjacent property owners, has been executed pending <br />resolve of the subdivision application. In preliminary discussions with <br />the representative of the MacMillians, staff was advised that there was no <br />plan to continue renting the existing structure nor make any use of the <br />existing accessory structures. The need to realign the lot line appears no <br />longer necessary since there is no plan by the new owner to subdivide the <br />property and would effectively function as a lot line rearrangement. In <br />any case, the current use of the existing driveway as a shared driveway <br />would be approved based on the two-lot use. The subdividers and future <br />owner of Lot 2 must be made aware that if the alignment for future access <br />is not provided at this time, if Lot 2 is further subdivided, that the <br />presen* easement access will not be approved for additional lots. The <br />wetlands adjacent to Orono Orchard Road is a DNR protected wetlands and <br />cannot be filled. Access must be provided via adjacent properties. I’he <br />final resolution approving the plat will clearly state that the present <br />shared drive is only acceptable at a two-lot use level. If Lot 2 is <br />divided in the future, the existing access easement is not acceptable. <br />Per Mike Gaffron's memo (Exhibit D), staff clearly cannot recommend <br />that any ditching be done at this time of the year. This need not delay <br />preliminary plat approval but staff must recommend against granting final <br />•..* V •: . . - -V <br />t !■> l-l:'; ■■■ .'Vv <br />r'-'-v-f. <br />T;y\ <br />y:: 1i' ■ iIV y <br />mvy-. <br />t <br />•■■•y-v". ^ <br />y.: ; . <br />'fV; •iV:.y'y <br />A y -yy:;: <br />f ■ -• <br />v.y;y <br />•yy-r ’-y ^1'.;'y ■■ yy-yy^^ty y-vV;-y . ; <br />•yyfi>yyyy-yyy^iiMy,y:Ay- <br />ry-:A4^4-y::' <br />1^ <br />-y ■ V <br />■' -yw iJirwi '^yyy y;;,--. v.;>.; y;^i <br />! • • • • .‘.• •'■.:7V <br />■ - yy'.• j^-yyy <br />:yr:yj:' <br />MmM pyl! <br />slBy y ’ <br />7-yy"^* ::• vJ <br />ry mvmmmmymmrnmm■.yy.;; :l;-:: .7^'-RyyiayyisMi:v;:v7‘iS#:a^ <br />4 <br />mmmm <br />.^r^yyw ;iy;’4;yyi^ <br />yyymm <br />.... ^ ... <br />a' <br />4 ■ ,i -AmS'v <br />•■Vyy'y-y^'-yvyyMc,: <br />^: m “^yy.V:. <br />yyy- 'r. • ■. yy <br />-yy.;:;py7; <br />' ':yys-:y yy'^yy-i <br />' ■ V:'.'.. .■• 'yy-': <br />%sv ‘. . <br />mm Pv;4P.P:vv:ai4y-4>.