Laserfiche WebLink
to eolve th« <br />n^fit of pormit <br />n th« original <br />!d. This still <br />he applicant's <br />ond that has an <br />with a plastic <br />oulders outline <br />tlong the south <br />landscape area, <br />liter installed <br />I of the house. <br />IS hardcover by <br />Commission. In <br />Ic as hardcover, <br />would bring the <br />etback area and <br />a where none is <br />ing the current <br />e-construct the <br />i noted that the <br />been installed <br />ars to be below <br />oulders in the <br />931.5. The 75» <br />g the lakeshore <br />eems to provide <br />rater discharged <br />tal inforroatlofl <br />i City's role to <br />consistent with <br />tected area and <br />bion that dealt <br />a or within the <br />in called for a <br />ird based on the <br />property. Once <br />ning the v»ay it <br />pear to be more <br />losing rile §1309 <br />August 11# 19il <br />tage 4 of 4 <br />The fianning CosaULssiofi isliiOQld address the following Iteaui so that OuT <br />new resident has soM basie understand ing as to what th# City deems <br />approvable in solving this type of drsinage problems <br />1. Mould you approve the (crushad roefit landacapinf without the filtef <br />fabric? <br />2. Would you approve the pond if it was outlined merely with the <br />boulders, with no filter fabric with only a grassed swale carrylisf the <br />run-off from the east sleng tha south lot line. <br />3. Applicant should be advised if the only scceptsble method for <br />desling with the drainege on tha proparty is the original plan th^ <br />called for a grasaad swale that would fan out to more geAtl# graduated <br />slopes in the grassed lakeshore yard« <br />3, The fill that has been placed within the flood plain ie a far <br />inKortant issue. Staff would have to recommend against plac«»nt of <br />fill within the flood plain as the City has been consistent in denying <br />fill withir the flood plain. If the fill or pond is to remain# It <br />should bs reviewed by the Minnehaha watsr Creek District. <br />4. Any othsr options or methods of drainage Improvement that the <br />Planning Ccoalasion would like to address or advise applicant. <br />In any caset claarly the Planning Commission must tabla the currant <br />proposal and based on the directives to the applicant# ths applicant and <br />applicant's contractor must wotk i*ith City staff to revise the current <br />drainage proposal and reeowiand a schadule to make the necessary changas <br />within a reasonabla tima fr <br />■1 msp^ ■•v; ■ ■ <br />' ■ ■■ •. V <br />L - : ■ ' •fc.:'; <br />f. <br />..■>9 <br />■j. <br />u <br />CITT Of OiCWD,- <br />iniOPBRTt LOCATI <br />Sit© Addreaa <br />Property Identi <br />tl#»'^e check or <br />(for Condi <br />Please attach 1 <br />on reguired aui <br />APPLICAMT <br />Name filtL4 <br />Addreaa <br />OMinai (if difff <br />Hame _S <br />Addreaa <br />Date Prop< <br />t (dmJ (d< <br />PiSS * CQHDITK <br />Renswel P< <br />After-the* <br />111 <br />$1 <br />$1 <br />$2 <br />§2 <br />PR <br />orm APPLICAT <br />$1 <br />$2 <br />$1 <br />$ <br />$2 <br />$1 <br />Ot