Laserfiche WebLink
5 ^1 <br />Zoning File #1316 <br />August 6, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Staff would recoftiiaena the following course of action to the Planning <br />lission: <br />1. Regardless of what structure is ultimately approvedr hardcover <br />should not increase above the existing 29,9% as shown in the staff <br />hardcover review. <br />2. Maintain the 10* required setback from the rear lot line <br />3. Maintain the 10* required setback from the house and existing <br />detached garage, unless a reasonable hardship is shown to allow that <br />setback to decrease. <br />4. Unless a substantial hardship can be shown, applicant should cut <br />down the total floor area of the structure to meet the required 1,000 <br />s.f. maximum floor area standard. <br />5. Staff would strongly recommend that alternative sites within the <br />property be considered for construction of this garage to minimize its <br />impact on the property; for instance, placing the additional garage <br />west of the existing garage, to minimize the need for steep driveway <br />and its added hardcover (see Exhibit X) <br />Finally, I would note that the property owner has not signed the <br />application and should do so at his earliest convenience. <br />m <br />^ ' -41 <br />n-. <br />*v''' <br />I** <br />■’€#v,y ■ ’i ' . <br />Mr r <br />U ' ' / <br />* --m <br />mi <br />t m <br />m- <br />a'-*- <br />\r <br />k. i <br />V-. -.tm ^ A, >-■ .. <br />CITir OF c <br />Initial A <br />($50.00 <br />Renewal V <br />(no cha <br />After-the <br />PROPBRTF <br />Site Addr <br />Property . <br />Please ch< <br />Attach le <br />required : <br />APPLICANT <br />Name <br />Addrc <br />ONMBR (if <br />Name <br />Add re <br />Date <br />I (do <br />PRESENT OS <br />Prese <br />Prese <br />DESCRIPTIOI <br />Descr: <br />VARIANCES ] <br />Setbac <br />Other