Laserfiche WebLink
> <br />« <br />V ^ V <br />I <br />♦ <br />I <br />’»'* <br />%i. <br />approximately 7* from tlie line at ita closest point. Vote that thm topography ^ets higher as yoo move toeard the Anderson house. This new deck mill not encroach on an average lakeshore setback, and does not <br />“I setback since the stairs are a non-encroachment <br />and the railings that are located less than 10* from the prosertv line <br />extend no higher than a 3-1/2' fence voeld. The applicant notes that the <br />new deck is 4 tquar# tmmt Immu hardcoveir than tha |;ra-axiatifi9 dacJt, <br />4. Staff has revieved the hardcover on the site and finds that th# <br />lim^cape areas underlain by plastic generally are near the %*est side of <br />the house where that plastic helps to prevent drainage directly into the <br />bassMnt wall area. It would se» appropriate to allow this hardcover to <br />*■*“**'• would also note that much of the shrubbed area that has rock <br />underneath is underlain by porous fabric which staff does not consider as hxxrdcov^x e <br />Dlscussloii <br />It appears that the contractor doing the storm damage repair did not <br />nsed for a permit to replace the existing deck with a deck <br />•‘■ll**” i® site. Mr. Owens presumed that the contractor had taken out <br />were necessary. The applicant has been very cooperative <br />with the City in providing the necessary infoimation for this application <br />and has been working with staff and the city engineer during the various phases of restoration. <br />Staff BarnaMandatioB <br />Finding that hardcover is not incraaaed by this rebuilt deck, staff would <br />recommend spprovsl of s hardcover vsrisnce to allow continuation cf the 34% hardcover in the 75-250* sone. <br />I <br />J