07-18-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•4,, IV I - ^4. “ ■ : ->■<-»•' '* 4 r • Zoning Fll* 91306 jQly 13, 19lt Page Thrae of Threaft. Gian spoka aith Xiatbarly Eckhar<St of tha HNCC and she advisad that an eaaemant coold aarve thea teaporarily and than flla for tha aubdlvision latar in tha aonth. Gian also advisad Ms. Eckhardt that tha City would not faal obligatad to approva a futura subdivision of a substandard lot bacausa of tha original and earlier approval of the project over tha easesent area. MS. Eckhardt followed up with a call direct to na tha following day, advising that tha attorneys of tha MMCC noted that fee ownership was necessary for this type of structure. Ms. Eckhardt will file a Subdivision application with the City, h public hearing would be scheduled for tha August ISth SMMting. The currant Zoning District requires half an acre in area, or 21,780 sq. ft. Upon division of the land, the regaining property would consist of 27,420 sq. ft. Tha real issue for the subdivision will be tha creation of the 2,880 sq. ft. parcel containing the lift station. Tha MMCC say be asked to execute special agreesients with tha City that upon vacation of, or disuse of tha structure that they would be responsible for rasK>ving the structure and that said land aust be returned back to tha original underlying fee ownership. Such a resolution would deesi the subject parcel unbuildable and for the exclusive use of the lift station by the MWCC. Ms. Eckhardt has been advised that we would require a foraal plat of tha proparty. Staff Eecoaaiendatioii - The staff would suggest that the Planning Cooimission table all action on the current Conditional Use Permit until the subdivision application is presented at the public hearing for the August 15th meeting; then proceed with comprehensive action on both applications. The MWCC representative should be advised at your July 18th meeting as to Planning Commission membera* concarna regarding either tha proposed location, design, setbacks, etc., of tha proposed Conditional Use Permit for the lift station and any other concerns not cited by staff regarding the proposed subdivision. The timing of this project la most important to the MWCC and any unnecessary delays may impede the commencement of tha project this year. 1. In regard to the Conditional Use Permit for the lift station, tha Planning Commission may wish to relocate the structure more than 5 feet off of the designated right-of-way of the County Road. Applicant should be asked why it has been placed 5 feet, although actually 40 feet from the traveled road right-of-way. 2. Should the parcel be larger and deeper providing a greater building envelope for the structure? A Landscape Plan should certainly be provided for our August 15th Review. 3. What about parking needs for this structure - how often will persons be responsible for visiting the site. Parking area has not been defined on the site plan? 4. Any other comments of the Planning Commission. * • p * % ^ ♦ j