07-18-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

; y % <«■ a •ji foning File fl30€ July 13« 1911 Page 2 of 3Met of Bafeibite - A * Application B - Property Owner's List C - Plat Map D - Cook Letter B - HffCC Letter to City F - NWCC Letters to TobefBann G - Site Plan B - Pee Title Purchase Sketch plus Description X *■ Perpetual Access Base&ent and Tesporary Construction Baswsent Sketch and Description J - Elevation of Lift Station K Site Plan/Profile Lift Station 44 Approved in Appl. 1256 Review of Current Appllcetion - As Applicants addenduss E and F advise, the original proposal for an undergroumS valve vault and pusqp station had to discarded in place of current proposed punping station/lift station 32* x 20*. The current owner of the marine did not wish the marina property to be cluttered at the southeast corner of the property and asked that it be placed in the southwest corner of the residential property adjacent to the marine property. Mr. Toberman has a contract for deed for the property with the current owner Mrs. Straley. The structure will be approximately 11 feet high, located 20 feet from the residence that is now located on the sane property. The MWCC plans to remove the current gray structure in a serious state of disrepair, addressed at 3260 North Shore Drive, and will relocate the present resident’s in another facility. For the review of the current application, Planning Coaaisslon has but two standards to review: 1. That the subject public service structure must be located 50 from residential zoned property. feet 2. That the architectural design of the service structure be compatible with the neighborhood in which it Is to be located. The difficulty for this review is that the subject area is scheduled for change in use and change in zoning so that the current residential will be phased out. Is the 32* x 20* brick structure with an 11 foot height compatible with either the B2 or residential neighborhood? The staff would note that the current site plan does not show landscaping as the other site plans provided in Application #1256. The staff would suggest that the MWCC provide landscaping adjacent to the Structure. Care should be given so that any landscaping proposed around the structure not create a view problem with access to the County Road. In the process of reviewing the application with the City Engineer, the staff questioned the need for fee ownership. Indeed, if fee ownership was needed for parcel that the building is to rest upon, then we are dealing very definitely with a subdivision of the property. The entire parcel consists of 30,300 sq. ft. and the parcel to be divided off is 2,880 sq. . A m* k- ♦ . IonJulFagft.1stfeeof Ns. adz nec app Aug wou The ft. spe Btr the own for bee Sta tafc sub 15t The Pla loc for the the pro Pla of ask tra env for per def: J