Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Patrick Wolfe May 4, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />3066 • Tijg fact you had a boat bouse in the same location for many decades has <br />little bearii^ on the City’s consideration of such structures. City codes are <br />designed to eliminate such structures within rights-of-way or near tlw lakeshore <br />as they deteriorate. Once the building was removed, it lost any "non conforming <br />structure" status it may have had. <br />• Further, the fact that you used an existing "foun^i^" ^ this > <br />deteriorating slab) has little bearing, since per Section 10.55, Subdivwiori 26 (E). <br />"If any non-confwming use is destroyed by any means including floods to an <br />extent of 50% or more of its assessed value, it shall not be reconstructed <br />in conformity with the provbkms of this s^tion". Removal of the old shed <br />constimted a removal of nx>re than 50% of its assessed value. <br />All of the above leads City staff to conclude that you have not made and cannot make a <br />legitimate variance application for this structure. A variance will not be granted for construction <br />of an accessory buildup on the City right-of-way. <br />Tbe Muttan must bt nmand tamitdiataly. The ponion of your $175 W <br />application fee not used in k(al notice publicaiioo will be fctumed. I suggest you relocate the <br />Structure to a conforming site on the lot. <br />;Miint Adminiftiator Jeanne Mabusth and I would be happy to meet with you to discuss m <br />of Ihe poims in this letter and a possible location on your property <br />nouirer^ for tbe shed. Please contact me or Jeanne as soon as possible at 473-7357 to <br />arrai^e a meeting. <br />Sincerely, <br />p\ <br />Michael P. Gal <br />Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />MPG/ch <br />Enc. Sections 10.55, Subd. 26; 10.03, Subd. 5 <br />cc:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adm. <br />Lyle Oman, Building Official <br />Bruce L. Vang, Field Inspector <br />John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director <br />*v.