Laserfiche WebLink
L. <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17.1994 <br />(#7 - #1967 - K-P Propcitica/Olson - Continued) <br />Gafiron repotted the initial request was to subdivide the Olson residence from a 17.5 <br />pared kavuq) the rear property as an outlot for future developmem and an outlot with an <br />access for future devdopment. The plan was modified to facilitate the sale of the Olson <br />residence. It includes a 2.3 acre lot, an outlot for a road, an outlet to be later transferred <br />to property, and an outlot for future development. This would not include the <br />Geffie property but would include an easement to connect a back road to Bayside. The <br />question still arose whether the Olson property would be able to connect to an imerior <br />road. Another opfion was for an easement for a west access should the White property be <br />acquired. It was determined that the White property would not be acquired .ind a 4-lot <br />division will occur of tins property. At the last Council meeting, the plan was revised to <br />not include the Geffre property, tlnis, creating an outlot with an easemoit. <br />GafBon noted a letter from City Attorney Barrett regarding concern over enforcement of <br />the successors or hm of the Geffie property to be bound to the terms of the easonent <br />agreement previously laid out. The Gefire property is now part of the plan through an <br />agreemoit so tins matter may f» kmger be of issue. <br />The plan is now the same as that requested 1^ the City Staff, leaving options available and <br />contitds within the resolution what will happen under cUflcrent scenarios of development. <br />The park foes will be deferred on the outlot untO it is developed. Gaffron said both access <br />possibililies have been approved by the County and are workable. Theresidence * <br />have a fiulii^ septic, and Gaffion noted it will be replaced at a new location. <br />fiwr tiift iMue hfmtight up by Barrett in his letter. Gaffion <br />comnwnled that any approvri should stipulate the need fix the City Attom^s approval as <br />well. Mr. Peterson reported having a new signed agreement with Geffie bindii^ <br />successors and assignment shoidd that occur, and adeferred agreement to make a transfer <br />if Outlot B is used. Peterson also said the issue of the variances requested at the last <br />Planrang ConmusMon meeting has been resolved. The plans now caU for 2004'’ frontage <br />on Bayside Road and 50+’ from the deck. Peterson reiterated why the plan is in two <br />phases in order to facilitate the sale of the Olson property. He noted the cornmem given <br />1^ the City Council at their meeting for the desire of the input of the Planning <br />Commisxoo. <br />Mayor Callalian inteijected to the Commission members that if they as well as the City <br />Attorney were agreeable to the terms of the proposal, the City CouncU would be wUlii« to <br />look at this issue at their next meeting. <br />Mr. Olson commented on the importance of timeliness in this matter.