Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />% <br />•< <br />'U <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNUSSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER \ 7. 1994 <br />(HI - ^1976->Gamblc- Continued)4^ <br />Peter Achey of 47^?)>^yside voiced his concern with being able to sanity access the lots. <br />Due to the lay of the iSi Achev fdt placing the two drive%vays log^ether would create a <br />hazard, while the peak oftKbv(oad on Bayside would provid^Avhai he felt would be a <br />good safe entry. <br />'V, ✓ <br />Mabusth said th* County normally lik^Ho kee&drf'vew^y access away &om County roads <br />However, in I'm case, the County would Wiccess lo be from Bayside Road rather than <br />McCully. due to the high usage of Mc^iUy. far, Peterson noted a probltm wtth <br />combining the driveways due to the.steep grade anih^^ a safe access will be a pnonty. . <br />It was noted that a walkaway was shown for Lot I linking1t.to the Luce Line. <br />Lindquist moved. Peter'son seconded, to approve the two-lot subtTivision application for <br />Don Gamble at 46S0 Bayside Road to include the 8 Staff recoramendaBM^ted. along <br />with the additional requirements of wood chips to be used on the walkway <br />conneaing'Lot 1 to the Luce Line, and lot access subject to approval by Hennepin County <br />and tho'C^ity of Orono. Ayes 7. Nays 0. <br />ITEM W^^OIOVED FROJV^ <br />(#3) #1895 PAT WOLFE, 2971 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:25-7:50 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Mr. Woife was present. <br />Gaffion reported this application is for an after-the-fact variance for a shed located in the <br />0-75 ’ zone. The shed is lO’xi:*. requiring a building permit, is located 8’ from the <br />shoreline, and constitutes 120 s f of hardcover. It is also 3.5' from the side lot Ime next to <br />the public access and beach. The shed was replaced, rather than repaired, which <br />according to the code cannot be done in the 0-75* zone making it non-conforming. <br />The DNR recommended denial in a letter, later revising their recommendation that if the <br />shed was placed 10' from shoreline, the applicant should go to the City for approval. <br />Gaffron said there is a problem with the exact location of the property lot line. A Torrens <br />action probably would be required to determine where the lot line is located. This <br />result in the loisofbeach for the City The City recommends denial It should be noted <br />that the neighbors have said the shed has improved in appearance