My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
10-10-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 11:39:22 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 11:35:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Request for Council Action continued <br />4 of S <br />October 6, 1994 <br />Zooing File #1967 <br />.1 ■. Vf > - 1 ■eats <br />■■ dot has indkaled approval of OuUos B as an access location They also ti^a <br />» toS^- from the centerline of Bayside Ro«l. It ^ <br />aiMiuonal npM ^ otactice to leouiie this on Bayside Road which is defined in the <br />PlTas a ^coU^ar- areei requirin, only 30-3J- either side of centerline Staff <br />recommenb no additional right-of way be required at this tunc <br />Summary of I: <br />Will Council accept the apreemeni in lieu of includi^ Geffre's property in the plat to1create a continuous access outlet corridor to Outlet C? <br />2.Will Council accept the concep. of malting «» <br />development (not even one house) allowed until it is replatted or granted individua^ <br />b^iktobmw in the liiiure? Council may wish to confim applicant s intent for proceeding <br />wiirr^K^^o* C in the next year with or without the White propeny. <br />Options for Action <br />1.Approve per the findings and conditions of the preliminary plat approval resolution <br />attached. <br />Refer back to Planning Commission for further review. <br />3. Direct suff to draft a resolution of denial, suting reasons <br />4. Table, requesting further information (specify). <br />5.Other <br />Staff Recommendation <br />In recognition of Plimning Commission;s intent in <br />resolution for preliminary plat approval iiKOipora ing ^ ^ ^ Geffre property to create <br />agreemem as presented. While suff would prefer the nc^ f^able access <br />a complete ouiloi corridor to Outloi C. the ^ ^ consinied as including the <br />is: "S as long as its term •teplatted into buiktoble lore"'* “ of the agreement <br />mere revision of Oullol C to single buihlable lot ?n the plat and the <br />should be revised to do so. or the Geffre propeiiy should be includea v <br />tri^ingulsr outloi created. <br />.jA.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.