Laserfiche WebLink
Request ft>r Council Action cortinued <br />page 3 of 5 <br />October 6. 1994 <br />Zoning File #i%7 <br />Staffs recomincnJcd sohrticn was to create a private road (Ouiloi B) in the potential road <br />bM 1. m »l»o left • I»™i lO""'" ■'> ‘‘j*-*"' ■“ p^fty- <br />which wwiU h! combined with Geffre s residence ptree! if fXillot B wis indeed used « a ro»d <br />right-of-way in the future. <br />Olson s remainin, U acres is designated as Outlo. C w ith the <br />Cloned for even one single family residence withiHit ftraire City approval. This delays the <br />paymem of park fees for the 14 acres until it is funher developed. <br />ei.rr hinher recommended that the Geffre property be included in the plat (see Exhibit B) and <br />a trUnguUr outlot matching a preexisting acceM e«^nlte pl»"ed to <br />outlotlLection from Bay.ide Road to Outl« C Aw*eys pemmari <br />^ ____a.^1 — |_ osBttltat Geffre Irmn the subdlvisioa. and proptwes the Liiy i <br />Exiiibit C). <br />Geffre Property - Easement vs. Outlot <br />^ pM m CIUII.S . tripupuHc «iito lo cmnplwe P* ’I™." <br />comer of Geffre’s property. <br />:s.“ -szit'ii ».. ^«- -« <br />plat was before you now (see 9/15/94 memo Exhibit F). <br />One additional quirk: The agreement discusses replatting Oudot C into "“I* <br />^Id^ consttSed as not anticipating Outlot C being repUtred as * <br />case of replatting Outlot C into a smgle builda^ lot or reqws t * <br />might argue that the addition of Outlot A and served^y a private road onto <br />oeffre-s pretty yieUl in !^cess. AUemative.y, <br />which the Olson residence, the Gcftre resioence, anu uic i ni«rn and the <br />it could be coasidered as merely a lot line „„ This inteipretation <br />creation of a private driveway outlot to serve the large parcel to the rear, mis m ip <br />would be left to Council.